Am 30.05.2017 um 22:06 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
On 05/26/2017 01:46 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
It feels a bit late to do this for 9.0.x although we code if we wanted
to. It is more of an option for 10.0.x.
Tomcat 9 is still in an alpha stage and not widely deployed yet. I
wouldn't be shocked if AP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 5/30/17 4:57 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 30/05/17 21:00, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> On 05/30/2017 08:01 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>
>>> Unless OpenSSL starts providing a JNI binding, we'll always
>>> have to have a wrapper for it.
>>
2017-05-30 15:57 GMT-05:00 Mark Thomas :
> On 30/05/17 21:00, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > On 05/30/2017 08:01 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> >
> >> Unless OpenSSL starts providing a JNI binding, we'll always have to
> >> have a wrapper for it.
> >
> > Unless JNA is used. Has anyone experimented wi
On 30/05/17 21:00, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> On 05/30/2017 08:01 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>
>> Unless OpenSSL starts providing a JNI binding, we'll always have to
>> have a wrapper for it.
>
> Unless JNA is used. Has anyone experimented with this yet?
I've looked at it, but not worked with
On 05/26/2017 01:46 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> It feels a bit late to do this for 9.0.x although we code if we wanted
> to. It is more of an option for 10.0.x.
Tomcat 9 is still in an alpha stage and not widely deployed yet. I
wouldn't be shocked if APR was dropped in this release.
Emmanuel Bourg
On 05/30/2017 08:01 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Unless OpenSSL starts providing a JNI binding, we'll always have to
> have a wrapper for it.
Unless JNA is used. Has anyone experimented with this yet?
Emmanuel Bourg
-
To un
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 5/26/17 7:46 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 25/05/17 18:04, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> At ApacheCon, a few of us were talking about things that could
>> be removed in upcoming versions of Tomcat. The issue of
>> connectors came
Hi,
2017-05-26 14:46 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
>
> On 25/05/17 18:04, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > At ApacheCon, a few of us were talking about things that could be
> > removed in upcoming versions of Tomcat. The issue of connectors came up,
> > and I was thinking that there doesn't s
Am 26.05.2017 um 13:46 schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 25/05/17 18:04, Christopher Schultz wrote:
All,
At ApacheCon, a few of us were talking about things that could be
removed in upcoming versions of Tomcat. The issue of connectors came up,
and I was thinking that there doesn't seem to be a reason to
2017-05-26 6:46 GMT-05:00 Mark Thomas :
> On 25/05/17 18:04, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > At ApacheCon, a few of us were talking about things that could be
> > removed in upcoming versions of Tomcat. The issue of connectors came up,
> > and I was thinking that there doesn't seem to
On May 26, 2017 07:46, "Mark Thomas" wrote:
On 25/05/17 18:04, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> All,
>
> At ApacheCon, a few of us were talking about things that could be
> removed in upcoming versions of Tomcat. The issue of connectors came up,
> and I was thinking that there doesn't seem to be a re
On 25/05/17 18:04, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> All,
>
> At ApacheCon, a few of us were talking about things that could be
> removed in upcoming versions of Tomcat. The issue of connectors came up,
> and I was thinking that there doesn't seem to be a reason to have an
> AjpApr connector any more.
All,
At ApacheCon, a few of us were talking about things that could be
removed in upcoming versions of Tomcat. The issue of connectors came up,
and I was thinking that there doesn't seem to be a reason to have an
AjpApr connector any more.
The APR flavor of the AJP connector was only useful when
13 matches
Mail list logo
