Re: Progress towards mod_jk 1.2.33

2011-10-28 Thread Rainer Jung
On 28.10.2011 09:13, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 10/27/2011 1:10 PM, Mladen Truk wrote: >> On 10/27/2011 07:45 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: BTW, I plan to support IIS on XP+ which means dropping anything bellow IIS5.1 >>> >>> I'm OK with dropping support for IIS up until 5.0, e.g. up u

Re: Progress towards mod_jk 1.2.33

2011-10-28 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 10/28/2011 2:28 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 28/10/2011 08:15, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> On 10/27/2011 1:10 PM, Mladen Truk wrote: >>> On 10/27/2011 07:45 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: > > BTW, I plan to support IIS on XP+ which means > dropping anything bellow IIS5.1 I'm OK wi

Re: Progress towards mod_jk 1.2.33

2011-10-28 Thread Mark Thomas
On 28/10/2011 08:15, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 10/27/2011 1:10 PM, Mladen Truk wrote: >> On 10/27/2011 07:45 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: BTW, I plan to support IIS on XP+ which means dropping anything bellow IIS5.1 >>> >>> I'm OK with dropping support for IIS up until 5.0, e.g. up u

Re: Progress towards mod_jk 1.2.33

2011-10-28 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 10/27/2011 1:10 PM, Mladen Truk wrote: > On 10/27/2011 07:45 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: >>> >>> BTW, I plan to support IIS on XP+ which means >>> dropping anything bellow IIS5.1 >> >> I'm OK with dropping support for IIS up until 5.0, e.g. up until Win >> 2000 including if that's what you plan. Star

Re: Progress towards mod_jk 1.2.33

2011-10-28 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 10/27/2011 1:10 PM, Mladen Truk wrote: > On 10/27/2011 07:45 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: >>> >>> BTW, I plan to support IIS on XP+ which means >>> dropping anything bellow IIS5.1 >> >> I'm OK with dropping support for IIS up until 5.0, e.g. up until Win >> 2000 including if that's what you plan. Star

Re: Progress towards mod_jk 1.2.33

2011-10-27 Thread Mark Thomas
On 27/10/2011 19:10, Mladen Truk wrote: > On 10/27/2011 07:45 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: >>> >>> BTW, I plan to support IIS on XP+ which means >>> dropping anything bellow IIS5.1 >> >> I'm OK with dropping support for IIS up until 5.0, e.g. up until Win >> 2000 including if that's what you plan. Starti

Re: Progress towards mod_jk 1.2.33

2011-10-27 Thread Mladen Truk
On 10/27/2011 07:45 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: BTW, I plan to support IIS on XP+ which means dropping anything bellow IIS5.1 I'm OK with dropping support for IIS up until 5.0, e.g. up until Win 2000 including if that's what you plan. Starting support with XP / IIS 5.1 is fine IMHO. Haven't seen a

Re: Progress towards mod_jk 1.2.33

2011-10-27 Thread Rainer Jung
On 27.10.2011 17:37, Mladen Truk wrote: > On 10/27/2011 12:09 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I went through the open issues and there are many ISAPI issues, some of >> them might be easy to fix or implement. >> > > BTW, I plan to support IIS on XP+ which means > dropping anything bel

Re: Progress towards mod_jk 1.2.33

2011-10-27 Thread Mladen Truk
On 10/27/2011 12:09 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: Hi everyone, I went through the open issues and there are many ISAPI issues, some of them might be easy to fix or implement. BTW, I plan to support IIS on XP+ which means dropping anything bellow IIS5.1 Regards -- ^TM

Re: Progress towards mod_jk 1.2.33

2011-10-27 Thread Mladen Truk
On 10/27/2011 12:09 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: Hi everyone, It would be nice if those of you who are more familiar with the ISAPI world could go through the open issues and see, where you could help. I'll take a look into those next week. Regards -- ^TM

Progress towards mod_jk 1.2.33

2011-10-27 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi everyone, in the last few weeks I added some features to mod_jk and I think it would be good to have another release this year. I plan to discuss 43968 (IPv6 support) and probably include it. There are some open questions and I hope Eiji will respond in the ticket. I went through the open issu