On 01/05/2010 12:38 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 05/01/2010 17:41, David Jencks wrote:
On Jan 4, 2010, at 2:56 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
One thing that isn't clear to me is whether the requirement is for an
extension point for web application related instances (ie things that in
a J2EE envi
On 05/01/2010 17:41, David Jencks wrote:
>
> On Jan 4, 2010, at 2:56 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> One thing that isn't clear to me is whether the requirement is for an
>> extension point for web application related instances (ie things that in
>> a J2EE environment would be bundled in the WAR) or for
I've uploaded a couple patches to https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48414
with a new newSystemInstance method. I'm not sure why this doesn't
need to be in a protected block like much of the code that creates
objects for the app, but the original code wasn't in such a block s
On Jan 4, 2010, at 2:56 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 04/01/2010 02:46, Tim Whittington wrote:
No need to re-post. A ping would have sufficed.
We've experienced similar issues integrating lots of third party
libraries (Tomcat being one of them) into our OSGi runtime.
Thanks for your input.
On 04/01/2010 02:46, Tim Whittington wrote:
>
No need to re-post. A ping would have sufficed.
> We've experienced similar issues integrating lots of third party libraries
> (Tomcat being one of them) into our OSGi runtime.
Thanks for your input. I can't speak for the other Tomcat committers but
cat Developers List"
Sent: Friday, 25 December, 2009 11:27:09 AM GMT +12:00 New Zealand
Subject: Re: Problem loading classes with Class.forName() in
StandardContext.createWrapper()
I'd like to encourage a little more discussion on this topic. Mark
commented on the bugzilla entry to
cat Developers List"
Sent: Friday, 25 December, 2009 11:27:09 AM GMT +12:00 New Zealand
Subject: Re: Problem loading classes with Class.forName() in
StandardContext.createWrapper()
I'd like to encourage a little more discussion on this topic. Mark
commented on the bugzilla entry to
I'd like to encourage a little more discussion on this topic. Mark
commented on the bugzilla entry to the effect, IIUC, that he thought
this was a geronimo problem. I did some more experimentation and I'm
pretty sure it has nothing to do with geronimo specifically, but
relates to how Cla
In the tomcat-7 geronimo/osgi integration we've run into a problem
when tomcat loads listener classes using Class.forName. Using the
InstanceManager to just create the objects works fine for us.
In geronimo at the moment the InstanceManager has access to both
application and system classes
