Re: Objections about formatting options to time stamp in access log

2010-11-10 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2010/11/11 Rainer Jung : > On 10.11.2010 04:38, sebb wrote: >> >> The private static fields timezone and timeZone[No]DST are not final, >> but appear to be shared between threads. >> The method that creates them is synchronised, but methods that read >> them don't appear to be. >> It would be safer

Re: Objections about formatting options to time stamp in access log

2010-11-10 Thread Rainer Jung
On 10.11.2010 04:38, sebb wrote: The private static fields timezone and timeZone[No]DST are not final, but appear to be shared between threads. The method that creates them is synchronised, but methods that read them don't appear to be. It would be safer to make these fields final and create them

Re: Objections about formatting options to time stamp in access log

2010-11-09 Thread sebb
On 9 November 2010 21:35, Rainer Jung wrote: > On 08.11.2010 16:16, Rainer Jung wrote: >> >> A typical annoyance when combining Apache web server and Tomcat is the >> difference in access log timestamp. Apache logs the beginning of the >> request, Tomcat logs the end of the request. >> >> I added

Re: Objections about formatting options to time stamp in access log

2010-11-09 Thread Rainer Jung
On 08.11.2010 16:16, Rainer Jung wrote: A typical annoyance when combining Apache web server and Tomcat is the difference in access log timestamp. Apache logs the beginning of the request, Tomcat logs the end of the request. I added a feature to Apache trunk (will become 2.4) to make it configur

Re: Objections about formatting options to time stamp in access log

2010-11-08 Thread Rainer Jung
On 08.11.2010 22:04, Rainer Jung wrote: On 08.11.2010 21:25, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: My current idea with implementation is that the timestamp when request processing started can be placed in a field in the request. Such solution will be compatible with the recently added AccessLog interface.

Re: Objections about formatting options to time stamp in access log

2010-11-08 Thread Rainer Jung
On 08.11.2010 21:25, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: 2010/11/8 Rainer Jung: A typical annoyance when combining Apache web server and Tomcat is the difference in access log timestamp. Apache logs the beginning of the request, Tomcat logs the end of the request. According to the HTTPD docs [2], this

Re: Objections about formatting options to time stamp in access log

2010-11-08 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2010/11/8 Rainer Jung : > A typical annoyance when combining Apache web server and Tomcat is the > difference in access log timestamp. Apache logs the beginning of the > request, Tomcat logs the end of the request. > According to the HTTPD docs [2], this changed between HTTPD 1.3 and 2. 1.3 logs t

Re: Objections about formatting options to time stamp in access log

2010-11-08 Thread Mark Thomas
On 08/11/2010 15:16, Rainer Jung wrote: > A typical annoyance when combining Apache web server and Tomcat is the > difference in access log timestamp. Apache logs the beginning of the > request, Tomcat logs the end of the request. > > I added a feature to Apache trunk (will become 2.4) to make it

Objections about formatting options to time stamp in access log

2010-11-08 Thread Rainer Jung
A typical annoyance when combining Apache web server and Tomcat is the difference in access log timestamp. Apache logs the beginning of the request, Tomcat logs the end of the request. I added a feature to Apache trunk (will become 2.4) to make it configurable for Apache, which time stamp to c