>
>
> Binary dependencies for any build process do not belong in svn. The
> infra team doesn't go looking for them but where a project is found
> using them then they will be encouraged to use a more appropriate
> approach. The more excessive the usage, the stronger the encouragement.
> The odd ja
On 14/10/2011 17:40, David Jencks wrote:
>
> On Oct 14, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 14/10/2011 17:09, David Jencks wrote:
>>> If using a non-tomcat groupId is the only choice I'd keep the
>>> openejb copy in apache svn.
>>
>> That is not an option that is acceptable to the ASF i
