Re: New connector sandbox

2011-04-27 Thread Henri Gomez
> Performance isn't a reasion for AJP in the last say 5 or more years. The > major benefits of AJP are > > - smooth integration of a reverse proxy >  The connector patches the communication data of the web server >  into the webapp environment, i.e. client IP, protocol, server IP etc. > > - connect

Re: New connector sandbox

2011-04-27 Thread Rainer Jung
On 27.04.2011 08:53, Henri Gomez wrote: Now that HTTP connector is as fast as AJP connector, is it still required ? Performance isn't a reasion for AJP in the last say 5 or more years. The major benefits of AJP are - smooth integration of a reverse proxy The connector patches the communica

Re: New connector sandbox

2011-04-27 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 4/27/2011 1:53 AM, Henri Gomez wrote: > Now that HTTP connector is as fast as AJP connector, is it still required ? > > Ie, is there any mod_proxy for IIS ? You mean... http://blogs.msdn.com/b/carlosag/archive/2010/04/02/setting-up-a-reverse-proxy-using-iis-url-rewrite-and-arr.aspx ? --

Re: New connector sandbox

2011-04-27 Thread Mladen Turk
On 04/27/2011 08:53 AM, Henri Gomez wrote: Ie, is there any mod_proxy for IIS ? Not inside ASF. Regards -- ^TM - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.a

Re: New connector sandbox

2011-04-26 Thread Henri Gomez
Now that HTTP connector is as fast as AJP connector, is it still required ? Ie, is there any mod_proxy for IIS ? Le 26 avr. 2011 à 17:12, Rainer Jung a écrit : > On 11.04.2011 11:34, Mladen Turk wrote: >> On 04/11/2011 09:00 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: >>> 2011/4/11 Mladen Turk: Hi,

Re: New connector sandbox

2011-04-26 Thread Mladen Turk
On 04/26/2011 05:12 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: On 11.04.2011 11:34, Mladen Turk wrote: +1, but maybe as Konstantin noted just a simple top-level sandbox name like iis7 or connector-iis7 is enough. You can create any needed structure underneath. I think there's no real need to group sandboxes. O

Re: New connector sandbox

2011-04-26 Thread Rainer Jung
On 11.04.2011 11:34, Mladen Turk wrote: On 04/11/2011 09:00 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: 2011/4/11 Mladen Turk: Hi, I plan to create a sandbox/connectors/native/iis7 for a native IIS7 C++ connector (since Microsoft deprecated ISAPI) Any objections? I do not mind. Though 1) Do you need th

Re: New connector sandbox

2011-04-11 Thread Mladen Turk
On 04/11/2011 09:00 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: 2011/4/11 Mladen Turk: Hi, I plan to create a sandbox/connectors/native/iis7 for a native IIS7 C++ connector (since Microsoft deprecated ISAPI) Any objections? I do not mind. Though 1) Do you need those immediate levels? Will there be anyth

Re: New connector sandbox

2011-04-11 Thread Tim Whittington
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Mladen Turk wrote: > Hi, > > I plan to create a > sandbox/connectors/native/iis7 > for a native IIS7 C++ connector > (since Microsoft deprecated ISAPI) > > Any objections? We're only just getting the ISAPI one working properly ;) +1 from me - let me know if you w

Re: New connector sandbox

2011-04-11 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2011/4/11 Mladen Turk : > Hi, > > I plan to create a > sandbox/connectors/native/iis7 > for a native IIS7 C++ connector > (since Microsoft deprecated ISAPI) > > Any objections? > I do not mind. Though 1) Do you need those immediate levels? Will there be anything in them? I guess the code will go

New connector sandbox

2011-04-10 Thread Mladen Turk
Hi, I plan to create a sandbox/connectors/native/iis7 for a native IIS7 C++ connector (since Microsoft deprecated ISAPI) Any objections? Regards -- ^TM - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additiona