Re: Making AJP secret attribute consistent

2009-08-14 Thread Bill Barker
Since Mark has already removed the o.a.jk connector from trunk, I'd prefer to just fix the docs there and use requiredSecret etc. In the other branches it is easy enough to teach the o.a.jk connector to accept requiredSecrect as an alias for request.secrect, so even here I'd vote to add the alia

Re: Making AJP secret attribute consistent

2009-08-13 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2009/8/13 Mladen Turk : > On 13/08/09 19:43, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: >>> >>> Other option is to use required.secret instead requiredSecret >>> Much easier because requiredSecret isn't document, so one >>> can only find it browsing the source code. >>> >>> However dunno how to make it using curren

Re: Making AJP secret attribute consistent

2009-08-13 Thread Rainer Jung
On 13.08.2009 20:31, Mladen Turk wrote: > On 13/08/09 19:43, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: >>> Other option is to use required.secret instead requiredSecret >>> Much easier because requiredSecret isn't document, so one >>> can only find it browsing the source code. >>> >>> However dunno how to make it

Re: Making AJP secret attribute consistent

2009-08-13 Thread Mladen Turk
On 13/08/09 19:43, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: Other option is to use required.secret instead requiredSecret Much easier because requiredSecret isn't document, so one can only find it browsing the source code. However dunno how to make it using current property set/get methods I have just notic

Re: Making AJP secret attribute consistent

2009-08-13 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
> > Other option is to use required.secret instead requiredSecret > Much easier because requiredSecret isn't document, so one > can only find it browsing the source code. > > However dunno how to make it using current property set/get methods > I have just noticed - the following patch (as current

Re: Making AJP secret attribute consistent

2009-08-12 Thread Mladen Turk
On 12/08/09 15:18, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: 2009/8/4 Mladen Turk: Hi, JK connector uses the request.secret attribute for setting the AJP secret property. However APR connector and Ajp connector use the requiredSecret instead. This of course (first problem is that it's nowhere documented) makes

Re: Making AJP secret attribute consistent

2009-08-12 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2009/8/4 Mladen Turk : > Hi, > > JK connector uses the request.secret attribute for setting the > AJP secret property. However APR connector and Ajp connector > use the requiredSecret instead. This of course (first problem is > that it's nowhere documented) makes problems cause it requires to > hav

Making AJP secret attribute consistent

2009-08-04 Thread Mladen Turk
Hi, JK connector uses the request.secret attribute for setting the AJP secret property. However APR connector and Ajp connector use the requiredSecret instead. This of course (first problem is that it's nowhere documented) makes problems cause it requires to have separate directives depending on