Chris,
On 6/17/13 11:38 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> Mark Thomas wrote
>>> I haven't actually written any performance tests, but looking at the
>>> code it seems that HexUtils.toHexString would execute slightly faster
>>> for a 16-byte array because of repeated integer multiplication in the l
Mark,
On 6/16/13 12:04 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 15/06/2013 16:39, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> While looking into a patch for BasicRealm, I noticed that there are two
>> classes that convert byte[] to a hex-encoded string (e.g. byte[] { 1, 2,
>> a, b ] -> "12ab"): HexUtils and MD5En
On 15/06/2013 16:39, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> All,
>
> While looking into a patch for BasicRealm, I noticed that there are two
> classes that convert byte[] to a hex-encoded string (e.g. byte[] { 1, 2,
> a, b ] -> "12ab"): HexUtils and MD5Encoder.
That isn't what those methods do. There are 2
All,
While looking into a patch for BasicRealm, I noticed that there are two
classes that convert byte[] to a hex-encoded string (e.g. byte[] { 1, 2,
a, b ] -> "12ab"): HexUtils and MD5Encoder.
MD5Encoder only has a single method (encode) and it does exactly what
HexUtils.toHexString does, except
