https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
chamith buddhika changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #95 from Mark Thomas 2010-09-15 11:33:48 EDT ---
Now might be a good time to resolve this issue as FIXED and move to using
separate issues for any future improvements. That would keep this issue as an
archive of your GSOC work.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #94 from chamith buddhika 2010-09-14
20:36:41 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #93)
> I got to the bottom of the problem. The correct parent class loader was not
> being passed down the object hierarchy. I fixed that and applied yo
On 12.09.2010 03:45, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #93 from Mark Thomas 2010-09-11 21:44:59 EDT ---
I got to the bottom of the problem. The correct parent class loader was not
being passed down the object hierarchy. I fixed that
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #93 from Mark Thomas 2010-09-11 21:44:59 EDT ---
I got to the bottom of the problem. The correct parent class loader was not
being passed down the object hierarchy. I fixed that and applied your patch. I
can now get to the point
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #92 from Mark Thomas 2010-09-11 13:51:37 EDT ---
The patch is heading in the right direction and I am tempted to commit it.
However, I see a bunch of stack traces in the logs when I try to start a
Context so I think there is sti
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #91 from Mark Thomas 2010-09-11 13:18:01 EDT ---
Please enable validation in your build process and ensure in future that patch
you provide build with validation enabled. This one had a number of tabs that
needs to be replaced w
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #90 from chamith buddhika 2010-09-09
11:01:50 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #89)
> Created an attachment (id=25937)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25937) [details]
> o.a.Catalina.core Operations Patch
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
chamith buddhika changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25908|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #88 from chamith buddhika 2010-08-23
10:16:02 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #86)
> I am little bit confused here. MBean registration for the component happens
> within init(). But it is called as a part of the start() procedur
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #87 from Mark Thomas 2010-08-23 09:53:20 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #86)
> I am little bit confused here. MBean registration for the component happens
> within init(). But it is called as a part of the start() procedure.
It
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #86 from chamith buddhika 2010-08-23
09:41:38 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #85)
> When adding child containers, the children need to be initialized. This will
> register them with the MBeanServer so they can be configured bef
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #85 from Mark Thomas 2010-08-20 11:31:41 EDT ---
The patch is getting there but there is still quite a lot of work to do.
Starting from just a Server object the patch is insufficient. See my commits
earlier today for StandardSe
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
chamith buddhika changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25885|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #83 from Mark Thomas 2010-08-17 11:23:43 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #79)
> (In reply to comment #78)
> > (In reply to comment #77)
> > > Just as a reminder remember one of the goals of this work was to be able
> > > to
> > >
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #82 from chamith buddhika 2010-08-15
11:28:51 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25888)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25888)
o.a.Catalina.Core Operations Fifth Patch
Adds ContextMBean to support fin
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
chamith buddhika changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25862|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #80 from Pid 2010-08-13 03:26:46 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #79)
> (In reply to comment #78)
> > (In reply to comment #77)
> > > Just as a reminder remember one of the goals of this work was to be able
> > > to
> > > start wi
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #79 from chamith buddhika 2010-08-13
00:47:56 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #78)
> (In reply to comment #77)
> > Just as a reminder remember one of the goals of this work was to be able to
> > start with a 'blank' server object
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #78 from chamith buddhika 2010-08-11
23:09:16 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #77)
> Just as a reminder remember one of the goals of this work was to be able to
> start with a 'blank' server object and completely configure a Tomca
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #77 from Mark Thomas 2010-08-11 13:07:03 EDT ---
Just as a reminder remember one of the goals of this work was to be able to
start with a 'blank' server object and completely configure a Tomcat instance
via JMX. i.e. add a servi
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #76 from Mark Thomas 2010-08-11 12:59:22 EDT ---
Thanks for the updated patch.
I wasn't thinking of explicitly setting startChildren in the addChild() method
but it is a good idea and I like it. However, you need to rework your
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #75 from Mark Thomas 2010-08-10 09:46:59 EDT ---
> > Created an attachment (id=25862)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25862) [details]
[details]
>
> Any comment on this?
I only have intermittent inte
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #74 from chamith buddhika 2010-08-10
00:22:51 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #73)
> Created an attachment (id=25862)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25862) [details]
> o.a.Catalina.Core Operations Third
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
chamith buddhika changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25837|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #72 from Mark Thomas 2010-08-06 02:46:42 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #71)
> (In reply to comment #70)
> > (In reply to comment #69)
>
> I am little bit confused here.
> > - Start Tomcat
>
> I was under the impression Tomcat s
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #71 from chamith buddhika 2010-08-06
01:50:32 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #70)
> (In reply to comment #69)
I am little bit confused here.
> - Start Tomcat
I was under the impression Tomcat should have been already started fo
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #70 from Mark Thomas 2010-08-05 17:52:54 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #69)
"May require some work"?
It sure does. The following needs to be supported:
- Start Tomcat
- Via JMX, select the host
- Create a new context
- Configur
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
chamith buddhika changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25796|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #68 from Mark Thomas 2010-08-01 16:06:35 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #67)
> Any comments on this? However I am not sure this approach can be applied to
> addChild methods since different child types (Host, Context e.g.) require
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #67 from chamith buddhika 2010-07-31
10:46:30 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #66)
> Created an attachment (id=25796)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25796) [details]
> o.a.Catalina.Core Operations Patch
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #66 from chamith buddhika 2010-07-23
03:58:36 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25796)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25796)
o.a.Catalina.Core Operations Patch
This deals with operations add/remove
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #65 from Mark Thomas 2010-07-21 12:19:16 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #64)
> Currently I am bit stuck on above. Any ideas on this?
I'd start by looking at the MBeans for the components that currently have
separate MBeans.
--
Hi All,
For the interested my work so far can be tracked in this Bugzilla entry[1].
[1] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
Regards,
Chamith
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:00 PM, buddhika chamith
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As per my project with the GSOC I have been doing some work
Hi All,
As per my project with the GSOC I have been doing some work on improving
Tomcat JMX descriptors. So far I have gone through all the descriptors and
made changes where necessary (with the exceptions for couple of descriptors
which I am bit stuck currently) and most of them have been committ
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #64 from chamith buddhika 2010-07-19
10:25:49 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #63)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > It seems that o.a.Catalina.Core descriptor has got operations containing
> > POJO
> > objects instead of primitive
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #63 from chamith buddhika 2010-07-16
06:58:14 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> It seems that o.a.Catalina.Core descriptor has got operations containing POJO
> objects instead of primitive types which make them inaccessible v
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #62 from chamith buddhika 2010-07-15
21:45:46 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #61)
> Ping. No update/progress in over a week. Again.
>
> Overall I am beginning to have serious concerns about the rate of progress of
> this project
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #61 from Mark Thomas 2010-07-15 16:52:12 EDT ---
Ping. No update/progress in over a week. Again.
Overall I am beginning to have serious concerns about the rate of progress of
this project.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #60 from Mark Thomas 2010-07-08 17:56:28 EDT ---
All patches applied. Many thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are t
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #59 from chamith buddhika 2010-07-08
07:09:03 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25734)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25734)
o.a.Catalina.valves Patch
Removes non existent class descriptors and adds
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #58 from chamith buddhika 2010-07-08
07:05:50 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25733)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25733)
o.a.Catalina.users Patch
Removes non existent class descriptors.
--
Con
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
chamith buddhika changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25640|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
chamith buddhika changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25641|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
chamith buddhika changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25639|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
chamith buddhika changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25638|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #53 from Mark Thomas 2010-07-02 14:28:42 EDT ---
comment #36 - Patch applied
comment #37 - Patch applied
comment #45 - Patch applied
comment #46 - Patch NOT applied
comment #47 - Patch NOT applied
comment #48 - Patch NOT applie
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #52 from Rainer Jung 2010-06-27 13:15:50
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #51)
> I cannot seem to find classes FastCommonAccessLogValve, RequestDamperValve and
> RequestListenerValve described in o.a.Catalina.Valves. Have they been
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #51 from chamith buddhika 2010-06-27
07:38:53 EDT ---
I cannot seem to find classes FastCommonAccessLogValve, RequestDamperValve and
RequestListenerValve described in o.a.Catalina.Valves. Have they been removed
from the code ba
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #50 from chamith buddhika 2010-06-26
02:21:59 EDT ---
Where can I find the class JDBCUserDatabase? It is not in the package
org.apache.catalina.users as mentioned in org.apache.catalina.users descriptor.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #49 from chamith buddhika 2010-06-25
08:20:48 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25641)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25641)
o.a.Catalina.tribes.transport Patch
Removes duplicated descriptors from t
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #48 from chamith buddhika 2010-06-25
08:18:55 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25640)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25640)
o.a.Catalina.tribes Patch
Now descriptors for classes SimpleTcpCluster, R
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #47 from chamith buddhika 2010-06-25
08:16:27 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25639)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25639)
o.a.Catalina.ha.tcp Patch
Removes old TC5.5 cluster classes. Now the desc
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
chamith buddhika changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25516|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
chamith buddhika changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25473|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #44 from chamith buddhika 2010-06-25
08:10:29 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #43)
> (In reply to comment #40)
> > (In reply to comment #25)
> > > (In reply to comment #24)
> > > > (In reply to comment #23)
> > > >
> > > > > At l
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #43 from Rainer Jung 2010-06-25 07:29:52
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #40)
> (In reply to comment #25)
> > (In reply to comment #24)
> > > (In reply to comment #23)
> > >
> > > > At least some of them were part of Tomcat 5.5 ´
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #42 from chamith buddhika 2010-06-25
07:22:19 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #41)
> (In reply to comment #40)
> > (In reply to comment #25)
> > > (In reply to comment #24)
> > > > (In reply to comment #23)
> > > >
> > > > > At l
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #41 from chamith buddhika 2010-06-25
07:16:23 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #40)
> (In reply to comment #25)
> > (In reply to comment #24)
> > > (In reply to comment #23)
> > >
> > > > At least some of them were part of Tomcat
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #40 from chamith buddhika 2010-06-25
07:09:20 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> (In reply to comment #24)
> > (In reply to comment #23)
> >
> > > At least some of them were part of Tomcat 5.5 ´cluster and have been
> > > dr
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #39 from chamith buddhika 2010-06-25
06:55:48 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #38)
> (In reply to comment #31)
> > o.a.Catalina.tribes package descriptor has got mbeans which are present in
> > other several packages as well. They
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #38 from chamith buddhika 2010-06-25
06:36:26 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #31)
> o.a.Catalina.tribes package descriptor has got mbeans which are present in
> other several packages as well. They are
>
> SimpleTcpCluster
> P
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
chamith buddhika changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25564|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
chamith buddhika changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25517|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #35 from chamith buddhika 2010-06-22
00:00:20 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #34)
> Ping. No update/progress in over a week. I'm starting to get concerned.
Sorry I was extremely busy last 1 and half weeks with my university work
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #34 from Mark Thomas 2010-06-21 19:12:50 EDT ---
Ping. No update/progress in over a week. I'm starting to get concerned.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receivin
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #33 from Mark Thomas 2010-06-13 17:28:29 EDT ---
comment #20 - Patch applied
comment #21 - Patch *NOT* applied
resetStatistics() operation has been removed yet it exists. Why?
comment #26 - Patch applied
comment #2
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #32 from chamith buddhika 2010-06-09
06:25:46 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25564)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25564)
o.a.Catalina.tribes.membership Patch
Remove mbean descriptor methods usin
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #31 from chamith buddhika 2010-06-09
06:20:02 EDT ---
o.a.Catalina.tribes package descriptor has got mbeans which are present in
other several packages as well. They are
SimpleTcpCluster
Present in following package descript
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #30 from chamith buddhika 2010-06-09
06:12:03 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #29)
> Created an attachment (id=25563)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25563) [details]
> o.a.Catalina.Startup Patch
>
> Ad
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #29 from chamith buddhika 2010-06-09
06:10:02 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25563)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25563)
o.a.Catalina.Startup Patch
Adds missing attributes.
--
Configure bugmai
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #28 from chamith buddhika 2010-06-09
06:08:17 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25562)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25562)
o.a.Catalina.session Patch
Adds missing attributes/methods and reorders t
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #27 from chamith buddhika 2010-06-09
05:45:12 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25556)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25556)
o.a.Catalina.Realm Patch
UserDatabaseRealm and LockoutRealm contains a me
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #26 from chamith buddhika 2010-06-09
05:02:32 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=2)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2)
o.a.Catalina.Mbeans Patch
Adds missing methods.
--
Configure bugmail: h
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #25 from Rainer Jung 2010-06-09 03:44:29
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> (In reply to comment #23)
>
> > At least some of them were part of Tomcat 5.5 ´cluster and have been dropped
> > when the new Tomcat 6 cluster was wr
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #24 from chamith buddhika 2010-06-09
00:10:04 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> At least some of them were part of Tomcat 5.5 ´cluster and have been dropped
> when the new Tomcat 6 cluster was written.
So their correspondin
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #23 from Rainer Jung 2010-06-03 09:52:52
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> I found references to some classes I cannot seem to find in the code base? Am
> I
> missing some thing here? Classes are
>
> - ClusterReceiverBase
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #22 from chamith buddhika 2010-06-03
08:54:14 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25518)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25518)
o.a.Catalina.loader Patch
Adds missing attributes/operations and reorders
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #21 from chamith buddhika 2010-06-03
08:52:31 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25517)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25517)
o.a.Catalina.ha.tcp Patch
I found references to some classes I cannot see
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #20 from chamith buddhika 2010-06-03
08:49:21 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25516)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25516)
o.a.Catalina.ha.session Patch
Adds missing attributes and reorders the ex
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #19 from Mark Thomas 2010-05-25 19:45:16 EDT ---
comment #15 - Patch applied
- Doesn't add much since container is unavailable
- More fuel for the separate MBean vs adding methods that return
the
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #18 from chamith buddhika 2010-05-23
01:38:44 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25474)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25474)
o.a.Catalina.ha.deploy Patch
Adds missing attributes to FarmWarDeployer.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #17 from chamith buddhika 2010-05-23
01:23:22 EDT ---
Package : o.a.Catalina.ha.authenticator
This package descriptor references to a non existant class
org.apache.catalina.cluster.authenticator.ClusterSingleSignOn.
--
Confi
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #16 from chamith buddhika 2010-05-23
01:21:31 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25473)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25473)
o.a.Catalina.ha Patch
This patch adds to o.a.Catalina.ha descriptor. In t
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #15 from chamith buddhika 2010-05-23
00:20:48 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25471)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25471)
o.a.Catalina.Deploy Second Patch
Adds getContainer() method
--
Configur
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #14 from Mark Thomas 2010-05-19 12:41:06 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> - EJB
> - LocalEJB
> - MessageDestinationRef
> - PropertyChangeListener
> - ResourceEnvRef
> - Service
I wouldn't worry about t
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #13 from Mark Thomas 2010-05-19 12:25:07 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> It seems that o.a.Catalina.Core descriptor has got operations containing POJO
> objects instead of primitive types which make them inaccessible via JCo
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #12 from chamith buddhika 2010-05-15
23:45:37 EDT ---
In o.a.Catalina.Deploy descriptor for NamingResources the associated MBean
(NamingResourceMBean) only exposes add/remove methods for following properties.
- Environment
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #11 from chamith buddhika 2010-05-15
23:28:41 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25444)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25444)
o.a.Catalina.Deploy Patch
Patch for o.a.Catalina.Deploy package. Adds get
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #10 from chamith buddhika 2010-05-15
23:21:44 EDT ---
It seems that o.a.Catalina.Core descriptor has got operations containing POJO
objects instead of primitive types which make them inaccessible via JConsole.
Was this intended
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #9 from chamith buddhika 2010-05-15
22:33:46 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25443)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25443)
o.a.Catalina.Connector Second Patch
This new patch on connector descriptor
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #8 from Mark Thomas 2010-05-06 08:14:47 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Created an attachment (id=25405)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25405) [details]
> o.a.Catalina.Core Descriptor Attributes
P
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas 2010-05-06 07:58:47 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Created an attachment (id=25404)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25404) [details]
> o.a.Catalina-Final-patch
There are still
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #6 from chamith buddhika 2010-05-06
04:25:25 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25405)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25405)
o.a.Catalina.Core Descriptor Attributes
Package: org.apache.Catalina.Core
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
chamith buddhika changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25389|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas 2010-05-05 05:06:20 EDT ---
Thanks for the updated patches.
The o.a.catalina patch still needs a little work. It makes more changes than it
needs to. The net effect of the patch is to make Role.rolename and
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #3 from chamith buddhika 2010-05-03
02:26:58 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25390)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25390)
catalina.connector-descriptor
Package: org.apache.catalina.connector
This
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
chamith buddhika changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25378|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas 2010-05-01 11:16:58 EDT ---
username and password are meant to be read/write, otherwise looks good. Please
update your patch and I'll apply it.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userp
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
Summary: JMX Descriptor Modifications
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: trunk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
100 matches
Mail list logo
