RE: Tomcat Connectors (JK) release

2022-03-18 Thread jonmcalexander
18, 2022 11:23 AM > To: dev@tomcat.apache.org > Subject: Re: Tomcat Connectors (JK) release > > On 18/03/2022 16:15, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID wrote: > > Is there any expected issue with dropping AJP 1.2? I don't think I've > > ever used it, but just wa

Re: Tomcat Connectors (JK) release

2022-03-18 Thread Mark Thomas
e received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. -Original Message- From: Mark Thomas Sent: Friday, March 18, 2022 11:07 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Tomcat Connectors (JK) release

RE: Tomcat Connectors (JK) release

2022-03-18 Thread jonmcalexander
ginal Message- > From: Mark Thomas > Sent: Friday, March 18, 2022 11:07 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Tomcat Connectors (JK) release > > Hi all, > > I was planning to do a Tomcat Connectors (JK) release soonish along with > testing that everything still w

Tomcat Connectors (JK) release

2022-03-18 Thread Mark Thomas
Hi all, I was planning to do a Tomcat Connectors (JK) release soonish along with testing that everything still works with the newest versions of Windows. I was wondering about making it a 1.3.0 release and dropping AJP/1.2 support. Thoughts? Mark

Re: JK release

2018-08-21 Thread Igal Sapir
On 8/21/2018 8:54 AM, Igal Sapir wrote: On 8/21/2018 2:42 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: There are quite a few open issues and enhancements and I very much doubt I'll be able to get to all of them so if any C coders have some spare cycles to help out that would be great (no JK experience necessary - t

Re: JK release

2018-08-21 Thread Igal Sapir
On 8/21/2018 2:42 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: Hi all, It is getting on for 6 months since the last JK release so I am planning on making a sweep of the open bugs, fixing what I can, tagging and calling a release vote. I'm hoping to be able to tag by the end of the week but, as always, circumst

Re: JK release

2018-08-21 Thread Martin Knoblauch
Hi Mark, at minimum I should be able review and test. Thanks Martin On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 11:42 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > Hi all, > > It is getting on for 6 months since the last JK release so I am planning > on making a sweep of the open bugs, fixing what I can, tagging and

JK release

2018-08-21 Thread Mark Thomas
Hi all, It is getting on for 6 months since the last JK release so I am planning on making a sweep of the open bugs, fixing what I can, tagging and calling a release vote. I'm hoping to be able to tag by the end of the week but, as always, circumstances may mean that that timescale slips.

svn commit: r16372 - /dev/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/ /release/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/ /release/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/windows/

2016-10-05 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Wed Oct 5 10:11:23 2016 New Revision: 16372 Log: Move the JK 1.2.42 release files into place. Update READMEs Added: release/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/windows/tomcat-connectors-1.2.42-windows-i386-iis.zip - copied unchanged from r16371, dev/tomcat/tomcat

svn commit: r10137 - /dev/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/ /release/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/

2015-08-11 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Tue Aug 11 19:20:25 2015 New Revision: 10137 Log: Release jk 1.2.41 Added: release/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/tomcat-connectors-1.2.41-src.tar.gz - copied unchanged from r10136, dev/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/tomcat-connectors-1.2.41-src.tar.gz release/tomcat/

Changes to jk release script

2010-10-21 Thread Rainer Jung
To simplify Mladen's plan to use RCs for jk release, but not including the RC name in the tarballs I adjusted the jk release script a bit: - flag "-t" is now "-v" for "version" and works as before - new optional flag "-t" allows to explicitely