On 14/07/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> think it should be all in order now
>
> http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/v1.0.6/
There are some differences between the source archives and the SVN tag:
In SVN, but not in source archive:
.classpath
.project
sign
On 14/07/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> think it should be all in order now
>
> http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/v1.0.6/
Eclipse and Findbugs show the following warnings for the non-test code:
Description ResourcePathTypeLocation
Class is a raw type. Refere
think it should be all in order now
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/v1.0.6/
If everyone thinks it looks ok, then I will put up for a vote in a few days
Filip
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.o
