On 14/12/2016 09:33, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> 2016-12-14 10:07 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
>
>> On 14/12/2016 08:54, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
>>> 2016-12-14 9:50 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
>>>
The failure happens on current trunk too so I don't think this is
related to the refactoring. However, I a
2016-12-14 10:07 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
> On 14/12/2016 08:54, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> > 2016-12-14 9:50 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
> >
> >> The failure happens on current trunk too so I don't think this is
> >> related to the refactoring. However, I am going to investigate this
> >> failure first -
On 14/12/2016 08:54, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> 2016-12-14 9:50 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
>
>> The failure happens on current trunk too so I don't think this is
>> related to the refactoring. However, I am going to investigate this
>> failure first - before I apply the refactoring.
>>
>> What is the in
2016-12-14 9:50 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
> The failure happens on current trunk too so I don't think this is
> related to the refactoring. However, I am going to investigate this
> failure first - before I apply the refactoring.
>
> What is the intermittent failure ?
https://ci.apache.org/builders/
On 13/12/2016 21:14, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 13/12/2016 15:21, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 13/12/2016 15:09, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>> Mark,
>>>
>>> On 12/13/16 6:24 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Hi,
Just a heads up that - assuming the currently running tests pass - I'll
be committin
On 13/12/2016 15:21, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 13/12/2016 15:09, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> Mark,
>>
>> On 12/13/16 6:24 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Just a heads up that - assuming the currently running tests pass - I'll
>>> be committing a batch of connector refactoring changes. The ge
On 13/12/2016 15:09, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Mark,
>
> On 12/13/16 6:24 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just a heads up that - assuming the currently running tests pass - I'll
>> be committing a batch of connector refactoring changes. The general aim
>> of these changes is:
>>
>> - Reduce
Mark,
On 12/13/16 6:24 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just a heads up that - assuming the currently running tests pass - I'll
> be committing a batch of connector refactoring changes. The general aim
> of these changes is:
>
> - Reduce the duplication of configuration between Protocol and Proc
Hi,
Just a heads up that - assuming the currently running tests pass - I'll
be committing a batch of connector refactoring changes. The general aim
of these changes is:
- Reduce the duplication of configuration between Protocol and Processor
In addition to removing a chunk of duplicate getters
