>> Mark, did Olivier have commit right to tomcat repo ?
>
> Don't think so. A quick vote can sort that out.
Thanks Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.
On 25/08/2011 15:39, Henri Gomez wrote:
>>> Do you want I submit a patch for the first import ? (As I'd like to
>>> contribute I would prefer to have karma).
>>
>> I guess you already have karma to commit ?
>
> Mark, did Olivier have commit right to tomcat repo ?
Don't think so. A quick vote can
>> Do you want I submit a patch for the first import ? (As I'd like to
>> contribute I would prefer to have karma).
>
> I guess you already have karma to commit ?
Mark, did Olivier have commit right to tomcat repo ?
-
To unsubscr
> Hello,
>
> Agree on the tomcat/maven-plugin svn path
>
> I wonder how do we move forward.
> Do you want I submit a patch for the first import ? (As I'd like to
> contribute I would prefer to have karma).
I guess you already have karma to commit ?
> I wonder about other tomcat devs interested t
Hello,
Agree on the tomcat/maven-plugin svn path
I wonder how do we move forward.
Do you want I submit a patch for the first import ? (As I'd like to
contribute I would prefer to have karma).
I wonder about other tomcat devs interested to participate ?
Thanks
--
Olivier
2011/8/17 Mark Thomas :
On 17/08/2011 13:44, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hello,
> FYI.
> I have moved the sources @codehaus to the retired path.
> The jira project is now read only (I will try to get an export dump).
> I wonder if we can use an export as this one [1] ?
> The web site [2] has been updated with a note regarding t
Hello,
FYI.
I have moved the sources @codehaus to the retired path.
The jira project is now read only (I will try to get an export dump).
I wonder if we can use an export as this one [1] ?
The web site [2] has been updated with a note regarding the move to ASF.
Thanks,
--
Olivier Lamy
Talend : ht
2011/8/16 Mark Thomas :
> On 16/08/2011 08:39, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> Hello,
>> So it looks the ip clearance has passed.
>
> Great news.
>
>> Perso, I'd like to maintain/improve the Tomcat Maven plugin in the
>> tomcat community.
>> Probably Mark too ?
>
> Yep.
>
>> The current feature I have in mi
On 16/08/2011 08:39, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hello,
> So it looks the ip clearance has passed.
Great news.
> Perso, I'd like to maintain/improve the Tomcat Maven plugin in the
> tomcat community.
> Probably Mark too ?
Yep.
> The current feature I have in mind is supporting tomcat7.
>
> How do we
Hello,
So it looks the ip clearance has passed.
Perso, I'd like to maintain/improve the Tomcat Maven plugin in the
tomcat community.
Probably Mark too ?
The current feature I have in mind is supporting tomcat7.
How do we move forward now ?
Thanks,
--
Olivier Lamy
Talend : http://talend.com
htt
Hello,
For folks who don't follow incubator@, some update available for this
thread here : http://markmail.org/message/xtsrzwyrosxdcina .
--
Olivier
2011/8/9 Olivier Lamy :
> In the same page, I can read a note about lazy consensus.
> FYI I have asked in this thread [1].
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Olivie
In the same page, I can read a note about lazy consensus.
FYI I have asked in this thread [1].
Thanks,
--
Olivier
[1] http://markmail.org/message/guvbec2h7hdj3zps
2011/8/9 Mark Thomas :
> On 08/08/2011 13:15, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> Hello,
>> So Ip clearance committed [1]
>> Web site need sync.
>
On 08/08/2011 13:15, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hello,
> So Ip clearance committed [1]
> Web site need sync.
> Let me know how do move forward now ?
According to http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html the
incubator PMC needs to approve this then we are free to import the code.
Mark
-
Hello,
So Ip clearance committed [1]
Web site need sync.
Let me know how do move forward now ?
Thanks
--
Olivier Lamy
Talend : http://talend.com
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
[1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1154937
2011/8/3 Mark Thomas :
> On 01
On 01/08/2011 13:44, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> Sorry for (very) long delay.
>
> The ip clearance xml form is here :
> http://people.apache.org/~olamy/tomcat-maven-plugin-to-apache/ip-clearance-tomcat-maven-plugin.xml
Looks good to me.
Cheers,
Mark
>
> Let me know if all is fine for yo
Hi Folks,
Sorry for (very) long delay.
The ip clearance xml form is here :
http://people.apache.org/~olamy/tomcat-maven-plugin-to-apache/ip-clearance-tomcat-maven-plugin.xml
Let me know if all is fine for you and I will send to incubator@ (it
looks to be the next step).
Thanks,
--
Olivier Lamy
Apologies Mark, I haven't been following the list. I've cc'ed myself in now.
The vote Olivier started on the Mojo list generally seemed to be in
favour of the move. I've raised an issue so that we can track
progress on this easier:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MTOMCAT-93
Olivier - what's th
On 24/01/2011 13:39, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Ok sounds reasonnable.
> I will inform mojo community and at least start a vote in the mojo dev ml.
>
> Thanks,
Ping. Any progress?
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tom
On 01/06/2011 15:18, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 24/01/2011 13:39, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> Ok sounds reasonnable.
>> I will inform mojo community and at least start a vote in the mojo dev ml.
>>
>> Thanks,
>
> Any progress on this? Things have been quite for a while.
"quiet" even. :)
Mark
On 24/01/2011 13:39, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Ok sounds reasonnable.
> I will inform mojo community and at least start a vote in the mojo dev ml.
>
> Thanks,
Any progress on this? Things have been quite for a while.
Mark
-
To un
Ok sounds reasonnable.
I will inform mojo community and at least start a vote in the mojo dev ml.
Thanks,
--
Olivier Lamy
http://twitter.com/olamy
http://www.linkedin.com/in/olamy
2011/1/24 Stefan Bodewig :
> On 2011-01-24, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 22/01/2011 13:17, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> Hel
On 2011-01-24, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 22/01/2011 13:17, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I don't know if this need a more official/formal vote ?
>> So what are next steps now ?
> Does this need to be via the incubator? This is an existing project but
> the likely destination is not as a Tomcat
On 22/01/2011 13:17, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I don't know if this need a more official/formal vote ?
> So what are next steps now ?
Does this need to be via the incubator? This is an existing project but
the likely destination is not as a Tomcat sub-project but as a module.
I'm not sure.
Hello,
I don't know if this need a more official/formal vote ?
So what are next steps now ?
Will we (Mark and myself) have karma to work on this or will we have
to provide patches ?
Thanks,
--
Olivier Lamy
http://twitter.com/olamy
http://www.linkedin.com/in/olamy
2011/1/19 Henri Gomez :
> 201
2011/1/18 Olivier Lamy :
> Hi Folks,
> As you probably know there is a Tomcat Maven plugin available
> @codehaus [1] which provide various maven goals to use tomcat during
> dev process.
> So the probably best and more natural place to host is (IMHO) the ASF
> repo (in the tomcat path).
> The two m
2011/1/18 Mark Thomas :
> On 18/01/2011 10:32, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> Hi Folks,
>> As you probably know there is a Tomcat Maven plugin available
>> @codehaus [1] which provide various maven goals to use tomcat during
>> dev process.
>> So the probably best and more natural place to host is (IMHO) t
On 18/01/2011 10:32, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> As you probably know there is a Tomcat Maven plugin available
> @codehaus [1] which provide various maven goals to use tomcat during
> dev process.
> So the probably best and more natural place to host is (IMHO) the ASF
> repo (in the tomcat pa
Hi Folks,
As you probably know there is a Tomcat Maven plugin available
@codehaus [1] which provide various maven goals to use tomcat during
dev process.
So the probably best and more natural place to host is (IMHO) the ASF
repo (in the tomcat path).
The two main contributors Mark Hobson (asf id :
28 matches
Mail list logo
