Getting back to this. Comments in-line.
On 23/05/2011 22:01, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2011/5/20 Mark Thomas :
>> All,
>>
>> I've been looking at [1]. Ignoring the flames, there do appear to be
>> several use cases where the current time-stamp checks are insufficient
>> (although there are simpl
2011/5/20 Mark Thomas :
> All,
>
> I've been looking at [1]. Ignoring the flames, there do appear to be
> several use cases where the current time-stamp checks are insufficient
> (although there are simple work-arounds). I have a patch [2] but I don't
> particularly like the fact that it breaks bin
How about calling it getDependantsMap() instead of getDependants() ?
Then catch the NoSuchMethodException (I in the case where the compiled jsp
doesn't have getDependants() and that would force a recompile (and then the
new version would be OK)
-Tim
On 5/20/2011 12:31 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Al
All,
I've been looking at [1]. Ignoring the flames, there do appear to be
several use cases where the current time-stamp checks are insufficient
(although there are simple work-arounds). I have a patch [2] but I don't
particularly like the fact that it breaks binary compatibility with JSPs
compile
