Yes, you said it before Rainer...thanks for your help as always.
Larry
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Jung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 12:51 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: FW: Delays in mod_jk
Larry Reisler wrote:
> Agreed, the root ca
] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 10:21
AM To: Tomcat Developers List Cc: Rainer Jung; Larry Reisler Subject:
Re: FW: Delays in mod_jk
Larry Reisler wrote:
Rainer --
I recently changed replaced the version of JBOSS Web we were using
to JBOSSWEB_2_0_0_GA_CP04. It included several patches to
two seconds.
Larry
-Original Message-
From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 10:21 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Cc: Rainer Jung; Larry Reisler
Subject: Re: FW: Delays in mod_jk
Larry Reisler wrote:
> Rainer --
>
> I recentl
jean-frederic clere wrote:
JBPAPP-366 is http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=589062&view=rev that was
a bug in the JAVA part not in mod_jk.
Right, however the idea to call the Socket.shutdown in a separate
thread is very good since it's blocking call.
The only problem is how to close bunch of th
Larry Reisler wrote:
> Rainer --
>
> I recently changed replaced the version of JBOSS Web we were using to
> JBOSSWEB_2_0_0_GA_CP04. It included several patches to the AJP code. That
> appears to have solved the problem. The FIN packets from the back end come
> back immediately now. I'm gue
Rainer --
I recently changed replaced the version of JBOSS Web we were using to
JBOSSWEB_2_0_0_GA_CP04. It included several patches to the AJP code. That
appears to have solved the problem. The FIN packets from the back end come
back immediately now. I'm guessing that the fix to JBPAPP-366
