RE: FW: Delays in mod_jk

2007-11-28 Thread Larry Reisler
Yes, you said it before Rainer...thanks for your help as always. Larry -Original Message- From: Rainer Jung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 12:51 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: FW: Delays in mod_jk Larry Reisler wrote: > Agreed, the root ca

Re: FW: Delays in mod_jk

2007-11-28 Thread Rainer Jung
] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 10:21 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Cc: Rainer Jung; Larry Reisler Subject: Re: FW: Delays in mod_jk Larry Reisler wrote: Rainer -- I recently changed replaced the version of JBOSS Web we were using to JBOSSWEB_2_0_0_GA_CP04. It included several patches to

RE: FW: Delays in mod_jk

2007-11-28 Thread Larry Reisler
two seconds. Larry -Original Message- From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 10:21 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Cc: Rainer Jung; Larry Reisler Subject: Re: FW: Delays in mod_jk Larry Reisler wrote: > Rainer -- > > I recentl

Re: FW: Delays in mod_jk

2007-11-28 Thread Mladen Turk
jean-frederic clere wrote: JBPAPP-366 is http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=589062&view=rev that was a bug in the JAVA part not in mod_jk. Right, however the idea to call the Socket.shutdown in a separate thread is very good since it's blocking call. The only problem is how to close bunch of th

Re: FW: Delays in mod_jk

2007-11-28 Thread jean-frederic clere
26, 2007 10:08 AM > To: Rainer Jung; Tomcat Developers List > Subject: RE: Delays in mod_jk > > Rainer -- > > I am using out of the box JBOSS 4.21 -- no special connector, and no firewall > between the httpd tier and the other tier. > > Indeed, I agree that the FIN pack

FW: Delays in mod_jk

2007-11-27 Thread Larry Reisler
isler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 10:08 AM To: Rainer Jung; Tomcat Developers List Subject: RE: Delays in mod_jk Rainer -- I am using out of the box JBOSS 4.21 -- no special connector, and no firewall between the httpd tier and the other tier. Indeed, I agree that th

RE: Delays in mod_jk

2007-11-26 Thread Larry Reisler
opers List Subject: Re: Delays in mod_jk Hi Larry, I'm again investigating your problem report concerning 2 second pauses during socket shutdown in JK maintenance. Sorry for the long pause, but I want to see, if there is something we need to fix before 1.2.26 related to this case. I couldn&

Re: Delays in mod_jk

2007-11-25 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi Larry, I'm again investigating your problem report concerning 2 second pauses during socket shutdown in JK maintenance. Sorry for the long pause, but I want to see, if there is something we need to fix before 1.2.26 related to this case. I couldn't reproduce the behaviour on Linux. Do you

RE: Delays in mod_jk

2007-11-05 Thread Larry Reisler
ates a new socket (35008) on which it successfully sends the transaction. Larry -Original Message- From: Rainer Jung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2007 12:38 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Delays in mod_jk Hi Larry, your analysis is correct, but the

Re: Delays in mod_jk

2007-11-03 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi Larry, your analysis is correct, but the results nevertheless a little obscure. Yes, mod_jk has no internal timing of management threads. We will move mod_jk to the APR libraries when starting JK3, but at the moment we rely completely on the web server plugin API. Apache has no timing API, so

Delays in mod_jk

2007-10-24 Thread Larry Reisler
We are running JBOSS 4.21GA(Tomcat 6.0.10) with mod_jk 1.25 on Apache 2.2.x, and have run into something of a performance issue. We have the system setup so that threads on mod_jk and tomcat timeout after 10 minutes (an heuristic which has been discussed in some of the documentation) using th