4 Jan 2022 13:03:57 Rémy Maucherat :
Thanks for the sync improvements.
As for the problematic scenarios, sequences like create/remove/create
seem confusing when reading the code but do work.
Agreed. I think I was getting confused by the possible ways to break it
with concurrent requests.
On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 10:07 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> On 01/01/2022 20:05, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 8:20 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Probably questions for Rémy but any input welcome.
> >>
> >> I'm looking at SpotBugs and it has a few warning for thi
On 01/01/2022 20:05, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 8:20 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
Hi all,
Probably questions for Rémy but any input welcome.
I'm looking at SpotBugs and it has a few warning for this class. My
questions are:
1. Should the methods the modify the database (createXXX
On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 8:20 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Probably questions for Rémy but any input welcome.
>
> I'm looking at SpotBugs and it has a few warning for this class. My
> questions are:
>
> 1. Should the methods the modify the database (createXXX, modifiedXXX,
> removedXXX) use
Hi all,
Probably questions for Rémy but any input welcome.
I'm looking at SpotBugs and it has a few warning for this class. My
questions are:
1. Should the methods the modify the database (createXXX, modifiedXXX,
removedXXX) use writeLock rather than readLock?
2. What sequence of actions b
