https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50887
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50887
--- Comment #5 from pkn...@mtg.de 2011-03-14 12:58:25 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Created an attachment (id=26765)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26765) [details]
> Proposed patch for Tomcat 6
I have teste
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50887
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26742|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50887
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas 2011-03-13 10:01:45 EDT ---
Fixed in 7.0.x and will be in 7.0.12 onwards.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: --
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50887
--- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas 2011-03-12 04:57:53 EST ---
I've had a chance to look at this further. With regard to the three points I
raised previously:
> - Security providers are normally configured at the JVM level
I can see why you
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50887
--- Comment #1 from pkn...@mtg.de 2011-03-08 05:19:58 EST ---
Mark Thomas has commented by email:
>The patch raises a couple of questions for me.
> - Security providers are normally configured at the JVM level.
> - Patches that change one o
