https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46933
Jens Kapitza changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46933
--- Comment #6 from Mark Thomas 2009-04-28 06:14:54 PST ---
This has been fixed in 6.0.x and will be in 6.0.20 onwards. This issue can be
marked as fixed once the second patch is moved to a new bugzilla entry.
--
Configure bugmail: h
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46933
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas 2009-04-28 05:00:41 PST ---
Can you create a new bugzilla issue for your second patch please. We try and
keep each bugzilla entry to s single problem. Cheers.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apach
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46933
--- Comment #4 from Jens Kapitza 2009-04-27
06:21:29 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=23550)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23550)
do caching the resources like the docu say it
do caching the resources l
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46933
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46933
Jens Kapitza changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46933
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas 2009-04-08 04:09:31 PST ---
Thanks for the patch. It can actually be even simpler as there is no longer a
need to ensure that the args provided are non-null. This was only an issue with
very early JVMs.
