https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46085
--- Comment #6 from Mark Thomas 2009-07-07 11:12:44 PST ---
Then that looks like a bug in the IBM implementation of atomics. Maybe try
testing with a newer IBM JDK? As an aside, this looks like it belongs on the
users list rather than
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46085
--- Comment #5 from Daniel 2009-07-07 10:26:26
PST ---
Hi Mark. Thanks for the link! I set ACTIVITY_CHECK to true and still got
random session timeouts with the IBM JVM. Setting STRICT_SERVLET_COMPLIANCE to
true didn't change this
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46085
--- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas 2009-07-06 15:15:42 PST ---
Looking at the code, I can't see why syncs shouldn't be necessary. Does this
still happen with a Sun JVM?
Additionally, if you are worried about correct session expiration yo
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46085
Daniel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.beier.b...@gmail.com
--- Comme
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46085
Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46085
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-27 11:33:49 PST ---
This has been fixed in trunk and proposed for 6.0.x
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are rece
