https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45026
--- Comment #9 from Rainer Jung 2009-04-06 15:14:57
PST ---
A fix has also been applied to TC 6.0 (r762499 (
https://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?view=rev&rev=762499 ) and TC 5.5 (r762510 (
https://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?view=rev&
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45026
Jens Scheffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECT
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45026
--- Comment #6 from Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-05-20 07:24:30 PST ---
See: http://marc.info/?t=12112883072&r=1&w=2
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receivi
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45026
--- Comment #5 from Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-05-20 06:01:31 PST ---
That helped a lot. Indeed it seems httpd 2.x forces a status line to contain a
non empty reason phrase, although RFC 2616 seems to allow empty ones. I poste
I already had a quick look at it when it was 44495 and couldn't see a
bug right away.
I'll check again, including combining with your TC patch for the status
text, and will report back via BZ.
Regards,
Rainer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=450
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45026
--- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-05-18 11:27:59 PST ---
Rainer - this might be quicker for you to track down. The following patch
ensures the correct status is returned but the body generated by Tomcat is
disappe
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45026
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-05-18 09:46:34 PST ---
Thanks Rainer. It would of been helpful if that had been included in the
original report.
I've taken a look at mod_jk and it seems to be complaining about
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45026
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-05-18 08:43:09 PST ---
If necessary, the httpd part of this issue should be discussed in its
predecessor BZ 44495 ( https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44995
).
-
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45026
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-05-18 05:02:26 PST ---
With the same version of Tomcat (trunk) and a slightly older mod_jk (1.2.24)
this appears to be a difference between httpd 1.3.x and 2.2.x
I've has a quick
