2015-09-10 15:52 GMT+03:00 jean-frederic clere :
>
> On 09/10/2015 02:10 PM, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't exactly know what is in trunk that couldn't be in a 8.1. The
>>
>> removals of existing features make a lot of the rest probably acceptable.
>> The EE schedule saying 2017, it's really
On 09/10/2015 02:10 PM, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
I don't exactly know what is in trunk that couldn't be in a 8.1. The
removals of existing features make a lot of the rest probably acceptable.
The EE schedule saying 2017, it's really a long time to be in beta [or
not maybe;) ].
HTTP/2 seems t
2015-09-10 10:51 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas :
> On 10/09/2015 09:36, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> > 2015-09-10 10:13 GMT+02:00 jean-frederic clere :
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have a wording questions from my ApacheCon presentations, I am using
> >> tomcat9 to speak about trunk but basically tomcat9 should be
On 10/09/2015 09:36, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> 2015-09-10 10:13 GMT+02:00 jean-frederic clere :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a wording questions from my ApacheCon presentations, I am using
>> tomcat9 to speak about trunk but basically tomcat9 should be with java9 and
>> the new servlet specifications. AKA
2015-09-10 10:13 GMT+02:00 jean-frederic clere :
> Hi,
>
> I have a wording questions from my ApacheCon presentations, I am using
> tomcat9 to speak about trunk but basically tomcat9 should be with java9 and
> the new servlet specifications. AKA far future.
>
I'm not sure it will require Java 9.
Hi,
I have a wording questions from my ApacheCon presentations, I am using
tomcat9 to speak about trunk but basically tomcat9 should be with java9
and the new servlet specifications. AKA far future.
It will be probably interesting to promote an intermediate tomcat
version with HTTP/2 and rel
