Hi Mark,
Did you get a chance to followup on the discussion on
core-libs-dev@openjdk mailing list ?
Rgds,Rory
On 12/09/2014 11:11, dalibor topic wrote:
On 11.09.2014 20:50, Mark Thomas wrote:
The protection against JRE triggered memory leaks is a source of a lot
of internal API usage:
http
On 12/09/2014 11:11, dalibor topic wrote:
> On 11.09.2014 20:50, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
>> The protection against JRE triggered memory leaks is a source of a lot
>> of internal API usage:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/JreMemoryLeakPreventionListener.java?
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the feedback, I will follow up on this.
Rgds,Rory
On 11/09/2014 19:50, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 11/09/2014 14:59, Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland wrote:
Hi Mladen/Mark,
As part of the preparations for JDK 9, Oracle’s engineers have been
analyzing open source projects li
On 11/09/2014 14:59, Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland wrote:
> Hi Mladen/Mark,
>
> As part of the preparations for JDK 9, Oracle’s engineers have been
> analyzing open source projects like yours to understand usage.
> One area of concern involves identifying compatibility problems, such as
>
Hi Mladen/Mark,
As part of the preparations for JDK 9, Oracle’s engineers have been
analyzing open source projects like yours to understand usage.
One area of concern involves identifying compatibility problems, such as
reliance on JDK-internal APIs.
Our engineers have already prepared guidan
