Re: APR and NIO

2008-11-02 Thread Mladen Turk
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: The async close is important to 'long-polling' which is what bayuex does. if you have 20 second timeout, there is a chance that the client could reuse the connection after it has received the 'end chunk' (0) from the server, and sends a new request. if there is n

Re: APR and NIO

2008-11-02 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
The async close is important to 'long-polling' which is what bayuex does. if you have 20 second timeout, there is a chance that the client could reuse the connection after it has received the 'end chunk' (0) from the server, and sends a new request. if there is no async close support, then the

Re: APR and NIO

2008-10-28 Thread Remy Maucherat
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 18:56 -0600, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > in trunk there is one difference, NIO allows async CometEvent.close, APR > has the hooks in place, but I haven't dared to dig into the poller code yet. > > that's the only thing I can think of right now. I only wanted to see som

Re: APR and NIO

2008-10-28 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
in trunk there is one difference, NIO allows async CometEvent.close, APR has the hooks in place, but I haven't dared to dig into the poller code yet. that's the only thing I can think of right now. Filip Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, Trying out Bayeux quickly (after all, there's still nothing to

APR and NIO

2008-10-28 Thread Remy Maucherat
Hi, Trying out Bayeux quickly (after all, there's still nothing to test with Comet wise otherwise), it works with NIO, but not with APR. What is the fundamental difference ? Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fo