Remy Maucherat wrote:
Ok, I'm done now (after one more changelog update), so I plan to tag
tonight.
Another round of small updates pushed this a little. New date: next Tuesday.
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please fix this issue.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41557
This is a minor issue. But it annoys people who use proxy.
It can be fixed easily.
Regards,
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addition
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Any thoughts on a 6.0.11 release?
I propose tagging on monday. The polish patches should be applied
before then (like the one which fixes the links in the examples).
Ok, I have a smal
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Any thoughts on a 6.0.11 release?
I propose tagging on monday. The polish patches should be applied
before then (like the one which fixes the links in the examples).
Ok, I have a small commit to make to fix a glitch
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Any thoughts on a 6.0.11 release?
I propose tagging on monday. The polish patches should be applied before
then (like the one which fixes the links in the examples).
Ok, I have a small commit to make to fix a glitch with Comet, but since
Hi Remy,
I know it's not that nice to suggest doing things without helping, but
maybe the missing release notes on the docs web page can be fixed for
6.0.11?
Regards,
Rainer
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists schrieb:
> works for me
>
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
>> Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
>>> Any thou
works for me
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Any thoughts on a 6.0.11 release?
I propose tagging on monday. The polish patches should be applied
before then (like the one which fixes the links in the examples).
Rémy
Hi,
On 3/30/07, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Any thoughts on a 6.0.11 release?
I propose tagging on monday. The polish patches should be applied before
then (like the one which fixes the links in the examples).
+1.
Yoav
-
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Any thoughts on a 6.0.11 release?
I propose tagging on monday. The polish patches should be applied before
then (like the one which fixes the links in the examples).
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-m
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 14:51 -0600, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> man, you sure like to write.
Doesn't take long to type ;)
> The buildscript command:
>
> ant -f extras.xml
>
> generates two files
> output\extras\tomcat-juli.jar
> output\extras\tomcat-juli-adapters.jar
>
> All i'm asking is
man, you sure like to write.
The buildscript command:
ant -f extras.xml
generates two files
output\extras\tomcat-juli.jar
output\extras\tomcat-juli-adapters.jar
All i'm asking is that these two get generated at release time
what I'm doing is publishing .jar files to a maven repository for
co
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 07:55 -0600, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
>
> sorry you had to go on for such a long rant,
No worries, just providing info that may or may not be know.
> no one is asking to bundle or to make dependencies.
> simply asking that some other packages get built at the same t
>
> I don't see any problem then. Since it is generated during the
> releases if you type "ant -f extras.xml", it should be possible for
> the RM to release these extra binaries (at least the binaries which
> may be legally shipped, or are practical to ship) along with the
> regular packages.
yes,
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 17:45 -0600, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
oh, and can we have the JULI with support for commons-logging built
as part of the standard build?
if, yes, then I will be happy
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 17:45 -0600, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
> > Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> >> oh, and can we have the JULI with support for commons-logging built
> >> as part of the standard build?
> >> if, yes, then I will be happy to do it
> >
> > IMO, no. I'd
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 23:22 +0200, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> > oh, and can we have the JULI with support for commons-logging built as
> > part of the standard build?
> > if, yes, then I will be happy to do it
>
> IMO, no. I'd like to keep a no dependencies, no nonse
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
That doesn't mean that the JAR has to be in the lib directory, all
I'm asking is that it is generated during our releases
I don't see any problem then. Since it is generated during the
releases if you type "ant -f extras.xml", it should be
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
That doesn't mean that the JAR has to be in the lib directory, all I'm
asking is that it is generated during our releases
I don't see any problem then. Since it is generated during the releases
if you type "ant -f extras.xml", it should be possible for the RM to
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
oh, and can we have the JULI with support for commons-logging built
as part of the standard build?
if, yes, then I will be happy to do it
IMO, no. I'd like to keep a no dependencies, no nonsense build :) I
don't see any need to use log4j f
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
oh, and can we have the JULI with support for commons-logging built as
part of the standard build?
if, yes, then I will be happy to do it
IMO, no. I'd like to keep a no dependencies, no nonsense build :) I
don't see any need to use log4j for Tomcat logging anywa
oh, and can we have the JULI with support for commons-logging built as
part of the standard build?
if, yes, then I will be happy to do it
Filip
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
The new Executor
It's a nice feature, but it's not urgent IMO. I'm not that happy
about it sin
Remy Maucherat wrote:
The new Executor
It's a nice feature, but it's not urgent IMO. I'm not that happy about
it since it's slow, too.
Bug fixes
Ok, but with the latest round of changes you made, I'd rather wait
something like one week for some stabilization (the last I've seen is
a rou
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
The new Executor
It's a nice feature, but it's not urgent IMO. I'm not that happy about
it since it's slow, too.
Bug fixes
Ok, but with the latest round of changes you made, I'd rather wait
something like one week for some stabilization (the last I've seen
Will it be a 6.0.11 beta or a release ?
2007/3/27, Peter Rossbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
+1
the NIO Memory leak fix is very important :-)
Peter
Am 27.03.2007 um 15:45 schrieb Filip Hanik - Dev Lists:
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
>> Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
>>> Any thoughts on a 6.0.11 relea
+1
the NIO Memory leak fix is very important :-)
Peter
Am 27.03.2007 um 15:45 schrieb Filip Hanik - Dev Lists:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Any thoughts on a 6.0.11 release?
What would be the main motivation for a new release ?
The new Executor
Bug fixes
Filip
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Any thoughts on a 6.0.11 release?
What would be the main motivation for a new release ?
The new Executor
Bug fixes
Filip
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Any thoughts on a 6.0.11 release?
What would be the main motivation for a new release ?
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any thoughts on a 6.0.11 release?
Filip
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
28 matches
Mail list logo
