Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
due to a pending move, I wont have time for this until 2nd half of January.
No problem. Unless someone disagrees, I will proceed with a 6.0.7 tag
later today (at 00:00 GMT+1, as usual).
Rémy
-
+1 to declare 6.0.6 beta. I am quite satisfied with its stability.
Martin
On 12/21/06, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I think it would be nice to proceed with a vote for 6.0.6 (no stable
this time either due to another batch of small glitches, but I think it
could be a beta if n
On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 11:29 -0500, Yoav Shapira wrote:
>
> Four, we've only had alpha releases, and I assume the uptake on these
> has been fairly low. Once we label a release as beta or, even more,
> stable, we'll get a bunch more testers, and then we'll see if/how much
> complaining there is abo
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
I think it would be nice to proceed with a vote for 6.0.6 (no stable
this time either due to another batch of small glitches, but I think
it could be a beta if no further problems are found), as long as
releasing a new 6.0.7 alpha build.
Cluster: It seems some work
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
On 12/21/06, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think it would be nice to proceed with a vote for 6.0.6 (no stable
this time either due to another batch of small glitches, but I think it
could be a beta if no further problems are found), as long as releasing
a n
On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 17:19 +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> Admin: I didn't see anyone yet complain or ask for the admin webapp in
> 6.0, so I suppose it's really ok to not have it
For Tomcat 5.5.20, since the admin webapp is not part of the binary
download (don't recall it being in there). We a
One, the management app market has matured since the admin webapp was
originally developed: there are now a bunch of capable admin apps
that support Tomcat: the lambda probe, hyperic, jmanage, mc4j, BEA's
thing, etc.
lambda probe is really great...
-
Hi,
On 12/21/06, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think it would be nice to proceed with a vote for 6.0.6 (no stable
this time either due to another batch of small glitches, but I think it
could be a beta if no further problems are found), as long as releasing
a new 6.0.7 alpha build.
Hi,
I think it would be nice to proceed with a vote for 6.0.6 (no stable
this time either due to another batch of small glitches, but I think it
could be a beta if no further problems are found), as long as releasing
a new 6.0.7 alpha build.
Cluster: It seems some work remains on the cluster
