On Jul 26, 2008, at 7:26 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As promised, here is the vote for inclusion of the bayeux toolkit
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45413
I think th
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
As promised, here is the vote for inclusion of the bayeux toolkit
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45413
I think this toolkit should
[X] +1 include it as an independent component, I'm interested
[ ] 0 sounds interesting
[ ] -1 throw it away
R
Costin Manolache wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As promised, here is the vote for inclusion of the bayeux toolkit
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45413
I think this toolkit should
[X] +1 include it as an indepen
+1 ... :-)
Peter
Am 22.07.2008 um 19:17 schrieb Filip Hanik - Dev Lists:
As promised, here is the vote for inclusion of the bayeux toolkit
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45413
I think this toolkit should
[x ] +1 include it as an independent component, I'm interested
[ ]
[X] +1 include it as an independent component, I'm interested
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Costin Manolache wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As promised, here is the vote for inclusion of the bayeux toolkit
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45413
I think this toolkit should
[X] +1 include it as an inde
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As promised, here is the vote for inclusion of the bayeux toolkit
>
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45413
>
> I think this toolkit should
>
> [X ] +1 include it as an independent component, I'
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As promised, here is the vote for inclusion of the bayeux toolkit
>
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45413
>
> I think this toolkit should
>
> [X] +1 include it as an independent component,
As promised, here is the vote for inclusion of the bayeux toolkit
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45413
I think this toolkit should
[ ] +1 include it as an independent component, I'm interested
[ ] 0 sounds interesting
[ ] -1 throw it away
I plan to put it under
svn.apache