Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 6.0.2

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: I agree, lets push this sucker out as a beta then [X] Beta Ok, so then there are 4 beta votes. I'll announce this release later today if there are no other reservations (most likely there won't be around anymore until monday, though :D). Rémy ---

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 6.0.2

I agree, lets push this sucker out as a beta then [X] Beta Filip Remy Maucherat wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: I'd prefer a 6.0.3, also due to a bug fix in the NIO connector (not picking up keystore password properly, or was this 6.0.1), but I'm not gonna hold back the 6.0.2 going bet

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 6.0.2

Its time for beta. More folks will kick the tires. -Tim Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, 6.0.2 is: [ ] Alpha [X] Beta - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 6.0.2

My alpha vote stands, there are a few bug fixes I added to 6.0.2: -output stream using the C2B converter -ApplicationDispatcher.checkSameObjects wasn't checking the root of the request/response that were last serviced -DBCP wouldn't even build with jdk1.5 To me, beta is when you can build, and

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 6.0.2

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: I'd prefer a 6.0.3, also due to a bug fix in the NIO connector (not picking up keystore password properly, or was this 6.0.1), but I'm not gonna hold back the 6.0.2 going beta by any means. Ok, but releasing a 6.0.3 as a beta would take about 10 more days, and t

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 6.0.2

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: My alpha vote stands, there are a few bug fixes I added to 6.0.2: -output stream using the C2B converter It is not a regression, the same code (and associated minor issue) exists in 5.5. -ApplicationDispatcher.checkSameObjects wasn't checking the root of the r

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 6.0.2

I'd prefer a 6.0.3, also due to a bug fix in the NIO connector (not picking up keystore password properly, or was this 6.0.1), but I'm not gonna hold back the 6.0.2 going beta by any means. Filip Remy Maucherat wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: My alpha vote stands, there are a few bug f

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 6.0.2

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: 6.0.2 is: [X] Alpha [ ] Beta just haven't had enough time to qualify it as a beta, but I want it to be available for download, so a vote is in order Thanks, let us know after testing. Rémy

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 6.0.2

Remy Maucherat wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: 6.0.2 is: [X] Alpha [ ] Beta just haven't had enough time to qualify it as a beta, but I want it to be available for download, so a vote is in order Filip - To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 6.0.2

6.0.2 is: [ ] Alpha [X] Beta - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 6.0.2

Remy Maucherat wrote: 6.0.2 is: [ ] Alpha [X] Beta I like it :) Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 6.0.2

Yes 2006/11/17, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Henri Gomez wrote: > is working for me :) So this means "beta", I suppose. Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 6.0.2

Henri Gomez wrote: is working for me :) So this means "beta", I suppose. Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 6.0.2

is working for me :) 2006/11/16, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi, Tomcat 6.0.1 has been available for over a week. Tomcat 6.0.2 updates a few packaging glitches, as well as two dependencies (JDT and the native library). 6.0.2 is: [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta Rémy ---

[VOTE] Tomcat 6.0.2

Hi, Tomcat 6.0.1 has been available for over a week. Tomcat 6.0.2 updates a few packaging glitches, as well as two dependencies (JDT and the native library). 6.0.2 is: [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAI