I am personally +1 on switching 6.0.x to CTR.
Just one note here, in http://tomcat.apache.org/svn.html
The following description should be changed after the vote get passed:
/trunk/ The primary development branch. Patches are committed here using
Commit-then-Review and then voted on for porting t
On 28.10.2015 23:42, Mark Thomas wrote:
[ ] Continue to use RTC for 6.0.x
[X] Switch 6.0.x to CTR
-Ognjen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>
> [ ] Continue to use RTC for 6.0.x
> [X] Switch 6.0.x to CTR
>
>
--
> Keiichi.Fujino
>
2015-10-29 0:42 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas :
>
> All,
>
> Many years ago, we switched all release branches to RTC primarily to
> address a community problem where we could not agree on the best way
> forward for some parts of the code.
>
> RTC served us well. The disagreements ceased pretty much instant
Am 28. Oktober 2015 23:42:08 MEZ, schrieb Mark Thomas :
>All,
>
>Many years ago, we switched all release branches to RTC primarily to
>address a community problem where we could not agree on the best way
>forward for some parts of the code.
>
>RTC served us well. The disagreements ceased pretty m
Mark,
On 10/28/15 6:42 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Many years ago, we switched all release branches to RTC primarily to
> address a community problem where we could not agree on the best way
> forward for some parts of the code.
>
> RTC served us well. The disagreements ceased pretty much instantly.
Am 29.10.2015 um 00:57 schrieb Konstantin Kolinko:
2015-10-29 1:42 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
All,
Many years ago, we switched all release branches to RTC primarily to
address a community problem where we could not agree on the best way
forward for some parts of the code.
RTC served us well. The
On 10/28/2015 11:42 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> [X] Switch 6.0.x to CTR
Basically there are so few fixes in 6.0.x that the RTC blocks any move
in 6.0.x
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.
On 28/10/2015 23:27, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> 2015-10-28 23:42 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
>
>> I would therefore like to propose that we switch the 6.0.x release
>> branch from RTC to CTR and am therefore calling a VOTE to make this change.
>>
>> [ ] Continue to use RTC for 6.0.x
>> [X] Switch 6.0.x t
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:42 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> [ ] Continue to use RTC for 6.0.x
> [ X ] Switch 6.0.x to CTR
>
2015-10-29 1:42 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
> All,
>
> Many years ago, we switched all release branches to RTC primarily to
> address a community problem where we could not agree on the best way
> forward for some parts of the code.
>
> RTC served us well. The disagreements ceased pretty much instantly
2015-10-28 23:42 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
> I would therefore like to propose that we switch the 6.0.x release
> branch from RTC to CTR and am therefore calling a VOTE to make this change.
>
> [ ] Continue to use RTC for 6.0.x
> [X] Switch 6.0.x to CTR
>
> Comments:
- How close is 6.0 from getting
> [ ] Continue to use RTC for 6.0.x
> [X] Switch 6.0.x to CTR
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
All,
Many years ago, we switched all release branches to RTC primarily to
address a community problem where we could not agree on the best way
forward for some parts of the code.
RTC served us well. The disagreements ceased pretty much instantly.
However, RTC also slowed us down.
The development
14 matches
Mail list logo
