Hi,
The results of the vote are:
Stable: 5 votes (Rainer, Guenter, Jim, Peter and mine implicit)
Beta, Alpha: None.
According to the vote, I'll put the releases
from tomcat.apacheorg/dev/dist to apache.org/dist,
wait for few hours and make an Announce
Regards,
Mladen.
---
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
So, can we agree I made an mistake?
Hey, I make 'em all the time...
No - I don't dislike you Mladen :) Nor Redhat - work with Marc and Joe
all the time on httpd-stuff.
Cool, let's move forward. I'll make sure I don't upload files
on random places any more :)
Ch
Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Apr 13, 2007, at 10:00 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>
>> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> On Apr 13, 2007, at 7:20 AM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
Let's try to chill out, please ;) I'm sure putting the candidate
binaries on the official mirrors before the vote was an honest
+1
Am 13.04.2007 um 08:33 schrieb Mladen Turk:
So here's the vote, which will be open until Tuesday April 17,
12:00 GMT.
Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.22 is:
[x] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
[ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
[ ] Alpha - multiple sign
On Apr 13, 2007, at 10:00 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Apr 13, 2007, at 7:20 AM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
Let's try to chill out, please ;) I'm sure putting the candidate
binaries on the official mirrors before the vote was an honest
mistake.
++1 (especially on the chill out p
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Apr 13, 2007, at 7:20 AM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
Let's try to chill out, please ;) I'm sure putting the candidate
binaries on the official mirrors before the vote was an honest
mistake.
++1 (especially on the chill out part ;) ) !!
I think the issue is that, especially
On Apr 13, 2007, at 2:33 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.22 is:
[X] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
[ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
[ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are
So let it be written; so let
On Apr 13, 2007, at 7:20 AM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
Let's try to chill out, please ;) I'm sure putting the candidate
binaries on the official mirrors before the vote was an honest
mistake. So let's move them to /dev/dist, have a proper vote like
we're having right now, and then put the legit re
> Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.22 is:
> [x] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
> [ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
> [ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are
Guenter.
Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.22 is:
[X] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
[ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
[ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are
Thanks for RM.
-
Let's try to chill out, please ;) I'm sure putting the candidate
binaries on the official mirrors before the vote was an honest
mistake. So let's move them to /dev/dist, have a proper vote like
we're having right now, and then put the legit release on the mirrors
again in a couple of days.
+1
Hi,
On 4/13/07, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Mladen Turk wrote:
>> I suggest you revoke my commit privileges to the
>> www.apache.org/dist/ so it won't happen again and you
>> won't need to repeat this again.
>
> I'm sure infra would be happy to if you wou
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
I suggest you revoke my commit privileges to the
www.apache.org/dist/ so it won't happen again and you
won't need to repeat this again.
I'm sure infra would be happy to if you would prefer this.
LOL. Man, you really don't like me ;)
Is it becaus
Mladen Turk wrote:
> I suggest you revoke my commit privileges to the
> www.apache.org/dist/ so it won't happen again and you
> won't need to repeat this again.
I'm sure infra would be happy to if you would prefer this. I'm assuming
the (this might be news to you) was news to you, but this struck
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Don't understand your question.
It was more then a week available for a developers review.
The official stable is still 1.2.21 until 1.2.22 gets votes or not,
in which case we'll go for 1.2.23.
So what's the problem?
How many times will I repeat t
Mladen Turk wrote:
>
> Don't understand your question.
> It was more then a week available for a developers review.
> The official stable is still 1.2.21 until 1.2.22 gets votes or not,
> in which case we'll go for 1.2.23.
> So what's the problem?
How many times will I repeat to this list that un
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
The source distribution can be downloaded from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/jk/source/jk-1.2.22/
or
http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/source/jk-1.2.22/
May I ask -why-?
It's not released (quite yet, ha
Mladen Turk wrote:
>
> The source distribution can be downloaded from:
> http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/jk/source/jk-1.2.22/
> or
> http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/source/jk-1.2.22/
May I ask -why-?
It's not released (quite yet, has 0 votes) - what on
Hi,
Mod_jk 1.2.22 has been available for testing for some days.
No new bugs have been reported so far, so it is time to proceed with the
release vote.
The source distribution can be downloaded from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/jk/source/jk-1.2.22/
or
http://www.apache.org
19 matches
Mail list logo
