[RESULT] [VOTE] Release build 4.1.40 - Take 2

2009-06-25 Thread Mark Thomas
With 4 +1's (3 from PMC members) for stable, the votes passes and 4.1.40 is approved for release as a STABLE release. I'll get the files in place, get the site updated, give the mirrors a chance to get updated and then make the announcement. Mark Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > [X] Stable > >

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.40 - Take 2

2009-06-24 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
[X] Stable Filip Mark Thomas wrote: The (updated) candidates source tarball and derived binaries are available here: http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.40/ According to the release process, the release based on the 4.0.40 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta Mark

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.40 - Take 2 - more votes please

2009-06-23 Thread Mark Thomas
Mark Thomas wrote: > The (updated) candidates source tarball and derived binaries are > available here: > http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.40/ > > According to the release process, the release based on the 4.0.40 tag is: > [ ] Broken > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] Stable Folks,

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.40 - Take 2

2009-06-22 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2009/6/16 Mark Thomas : > The (updated) candidates source tarball and derived binaries are > available here: > http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.40/ > Minor issues: a) When installing apache-tomcat-4.1.40.exe, the installer dialog page that allows to specify port number and name/

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.40 - Take 2

2009-06-19 Thread Mladen Turk
Mark Thomas wrote: The (updated) candidates source tarball and derived binaries are available here: http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.40/ According to the release process, the release based on the 4.0.40 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable [x] Stable Tested on

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.40 - Take 2

2009-06-19 Thread sebb
On 19/06/2009, Mark Thomas wrote: > sebb wrote: > > The source archives mostly agree with the tags, however there are code > > changes in the following files: > > > > connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Http11Processor.java > > connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf/C

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.40 - Take 2

2009-06-19 Thread Mark Thomas
sebb wrote: > The source archives mostly agree with the tags, however there are code > changes in the following files: > > connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Http11Processor.java > connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf/CharChunk.java > connectors/util/java/org/apache/tom

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.40 - Take 2

2009-06-19 Thread sebb
On 19/06/2009, Mark Thomas wrote: > sebb wrote: > > On 16/06/2009, Mark Thomas wrote: > >> The (updated) candidates source tarball and derived binaries are > >> available here: > >> http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.40/ > >> > >> According to the release process, the re

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.40 - Take 2

2009-06-19 Thread Mark Thomas
sebb wrote: > On 16/06/2009, Mark Thomas wrote: >> The (updated) candidates source tarball and derived binaries are >> available here: >> http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.40/ >> >> According to the release process, the release based on the 4.0.40 tag is: > > Did you mean 4.1

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.40 - Take 2

2009-06-19 Thread sebb
On 16/06/2009, Mark Thomas wrote: > The (updated) candidates source tarball and derived binaries are > available here: > http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.40/ > > According to the release process, the release based on the 4.0.40 tag is: Did you mean 4.1.40? Also, where can I

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.40 - Take 2

2009-06-19 Thread Mark Thomas
Mark Thomas wrote: > The (updated) candidates source tarball and derived binaries are > available here: > http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.40/ > > According to the release process, the release based on the 4.0.40 tag is: > [ ] Broken > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [X] Stable Here is

[VOTE] Release build 4.1.40 - Take 2

2009-06-16 Thread Mark Thomas
The (updated) candidates source tarball and derived binaries are available here: http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.40/ According to the release process, the release based on the 4.0.40 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] Stable Mark --

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.40

2009-06-16 Thread Mark Thomas
Mladen Turk wrote: > Mark Thomas wrote: >> >>> IMO the release is broken. >> >> If the windows installer issue is an isolated one it, the release is no >> worse than any that have gone out of the door previously. That said, the >> issues are all fixed so I'll roll a 4.1.41 release. >> > > Why not

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.40

2009-06-16 Thread Mladen Turk
Mark Thomas wrote: IMO the release is broken. If the windows installer issue is an isolated one it, the release is no worse than any that have gone out of the door previously. That said, the issues are all fixed so I'll roll a 4.1.41 release. Why not just re-tagging? It's no like it was re

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.40

2009-06-16 Thread Mark Thomas
sebb wrote: > The copyright year in the NOTICE files in the binary archive is still > 2008; surely it should be 2009? Yep, it should be 2009. This has been fixed. > The connectors/NOTICE file in the source archive is wrong. > > There are no NOTICE files for the jasper and servletapi directory su

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.40

2009-06-16 Thread sebb
The copyright year in the NOTICE files in the binary archive is still 2008; surely it should be 2009? The connectors/NOTICE file in the source archive is wrong. There are no NOTICE files for the jasper and servletapi directory sub-trees. It would be better to have a single N&L file at the top of

[VOTE] Release build 4.1.40

2009-06-16 Thread Mark Thomas
The candidates source tarball and derived binaries are available here: http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.40/ According to the release process, the 4.0.40 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] Stable Mark -