Mark Thomas wrote:
> It is unclear to me whether the archive is CTR or RTC since it does
> contain some old release branches. I would like to propose making the
> whole archive CTR. On the rare occasions where someone wishes to make a
> change to code in the archive, this will make it easier.
The
Mark Thomas wrote:
It is unclear to me whether the archive is CTR or RTC since it does
contain some old release branches. I would like to propose making the
whole archive CTR. On the rare occassions where someone wishes to make a
change to code in the archive, this will make it easier.
Unsurpris
2009/6/25 Mark Thomas :
> It is unclear to me whether the archive is CTR or RTC since it does
> contain some old release branches. I would like to propose making the
> whole archive CTR. On the rare occassions where someone wishes to make a
> change to code in the archive, this will make it easier.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> It is unclear to me whether the archive is CTR or RTC since it does
> contain some old release branches. I would like to propose making the
> whole archive CTR. On the rare occassions where someone wishes to make a
> change to code in the archi
Mark Thomas wrote:
It is unclear to me whether the archive is CTR or RTC since it does
contain some old release branches. I would like to propose making the
whole archive CTR. On the rare occassions where someone wishes to make a
change to code in the archive, this will make it easier.
Unsurpris
It is unclear to me whether the archive is CTR or RTC since it does
contain some old release branches. I would like to propose making the
whole archive CTR. On the rare occassions where someone wishes to make a
change to code in the archive, this will make it easier.
Unsurprisingly, here is my +1
