Re: [PROPOSAL] Move to svnpubsub for /dist/tomcat

2011-05-26 Thread Rainer Jung
On 24.05.2011 22:19, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 24/05/2011 20:24, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: >> 2011/5/24 Mark Thomas : >> 1. In what repository will the artifacts go? >> >> IIRC, there is some additional repository. I think it wouldn't be good >> to have them in /repos/asf/ > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move to svnpubsub for /dist/tomcat

2011-05-24 Thread Mark Thomas
On 24/05/2011 20:24, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > 2011/5/24 Mark Thomas : > 1. In what repository will the artifacts go? > > IIRC, there is some additional repository. I think it wouldn't be good > to have them in /repos/asf/ There is a separate /dist repo >>> >>> https://d

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move to svnpubsub for /dist/tomcat

2011-05-24 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2011/5/24 Mark Thomas : 1. In what repository will the artifacts go? IIRC, there is some additional repository. I think it wouldn't be good to have them in /repos/asf/ >>> >>> There is a separate /dist repo >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/...  dev and release, with tomc

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move to svnpubsub for /dist/tomcat

2011-05-24 Thread Mark Thomas
On 18/05/2011 17:33, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 5/18/2011 9:22 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 18/05/2011 15:06, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: >>> 2011/5/18 Mark Thomas : All, We have the option to move to svnpubsub for managing our releases. Rather than copying artefacts to peopl

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move to svnpubsub for /dist/tomcat

2011-05-21 Thread Tim Whittington
+1 On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > All, > > We have the option to move to svnpubsub for managing our releases. > Rather than copying artefacts to people.a.o and then waiting for rsync > (every around 2 hours) we would commit the artefacts to svn and a commit > hook would upd

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move to svnpubsub for /dist/tomcat

2011-05-18 Thread Keiichi Fujino
+1 2011/5/18 Mark Thomas : > All, > > We have the option to move to svnpubsub for managing our releases. > Rather than copying artefacts to people.a.o and then waiting for rsync > (every around 2 hours) we would commit the artefacts to svn and a commit > hook would update the /dist/tomcat area on

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move to svnpubsub for /dist/tomcat

2011-05-18 Thread Rainer Jung
+1 to Marks proposal. Shot additional answer to Konstantin inline. On 18.05.2011 16:43, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > Will the commit messages be forwarded to the mailing list? At least the web server project does it like that. For an example see http://marc.info/?l=apache-cvs&m=130509208030121&

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move to svnpubsub for /dist/tomcat

2011-05-18 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 5/18/2011 9:22 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 18/05/2011 15:06, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: >> 2011/5/18 Mark Thomas : >>> All, >>> >>> We have the option to move to svnpubsub for managing our releases. >>> Rather than copying artefacts to people.a.o and then waiting for rsync >>> (every around 2 hou

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move to svnpubsub for /dist/tomcat

2011-05-18 Thread Mladen Turk
+1 On 05/18/2011 03:38 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: If folks would like to go this route, I am happy to do the work on our end to migrate /dist/tomcat to svnpubsub. Regards -- ^TM - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move to svnpubsub for /dist/tomcat

2011-05-18 Thread Tim Funk
+1 On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > > We have the option to move to svnpubsub for managing our releases. > Rather than copying artefacts to people.a.o and then waiting for rsync > (every around 2 hours) we would commit the artefacts to svn and a commit > hook would update th

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move to svnpubsub for /dist/tomcat

2011-05-18 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2011/5/18 Mark Thomas : >> 1. In what repository will the artifacts go? >> >> IIRC, there is some additional repository. I think it wouldn't be good >> to have them in /repos/asf/ > > There is a separate /dist repo > >> 2. You will have to upload Javadocs. > > Huh? We are talking about www.a.o/dist

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move to svnpubsub for /dist/tomcat

2011-05-18 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
+1 sounds good Filip On 5/18/2011 7:38 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: All, We have the option to move to svnpubsub for managing our releases. Rather than copying artefacts to people.a.o and then waiting for rsync (every around 2 hours) we would commit the artefacts to svn and a commit hook would updat

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move to svnpubsub for /dist/tomcat

2011-05-18 Thread Mark Thomas
On 18/05/2011 15:06, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > 2011/5/18 Mark Thomas : >> All, >> >> We have the option to move to svnpubsub for managing our releases. >> Rather than copying artefacts to people.a.o and then waiting for rsync >> (every around 2 hours) we would commit the artefacts to svn and a co

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move to svnpubsub for /dist/tomcat

2011-05-18 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2011/5/18 Mark Thomas : > All, > > We have the option to move to svnpubsub for managing our releases. > Rather than copying artefacts to people.a.o and then waiting for rsync > (every around 2 hours) we would commit the artefacts to svn and a commit > hook would update the /dist/tomcat area on the

[PROPOSAL] Move to svnpubsub for /dist/tomcat

2011-05-18 Thread Mark Thomas
All, We have the option to move to svnpubsub for managing our releases. Rather than copying artefacts to people.a.o and then waiting for rsync (every around 2 hours) we would commit the artefacts to svn and a commit hook would update the /dist/tomcat area on the www servers immediately. If folks