On 07/06/2011 22:42, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> BTW, two minor thoughts wrt. o.a.c.startup.ContextConfig#webConfig()
> 1) Line 1208
>
> // Parse host level web.xml if present
> // Additive apart from welcome pages
> webXml.setReplaceWelcomeFiles(true);
> InputSourc
2011/6/8 Mark Thomas :
> On 07/06/2011 21:54, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> On 07.06.2011 21:39, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 07/06/2011 20:24, Jess Holle wrote:
web apps whose web.xml does not specify distributable should certainly
not be treated as such -- that would be a spec violation and break
On 07/06/2011 21:54, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 07.06.2011 21:39, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 07/06/2011 20:24, Jess Holle wrote:
>>> web apps whose web.xml does not specify distributable should certainly
>>> not be treated as such -- that would be a spec violation and break lots
>>> of web apps.
>>
>> H
On 07.06.2011 21:39, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 07/06/2011 20:24, Jess Holle wrote:
>> web apps whose web.xml does not specify distributable should certainly
>> not be treated as such -- that would be a spec violation and break lots
>> of web apps.
>
> How many times do I have to write this? This is
On 07/06/2011 20:24, Jess Holle wrote:
> web apps whose web.xml does not specify distributable should certainly
> not be treated as such -- that would be a spec violation and break lots
> of web apps.
How many times do I have to write this? This is NOT what is being
proposed. All the proposed chan
web apps whose web.xml does not specify distributable should certainly
not be treated as such -- that would be a spec violation and break lots
of web apps.
On 6/7/2011 2:08 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark,
On 6/7/2011 2:36 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 07/06/2011 19:30, Christopher Schultz w
On 07/06/2011 20:08, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Mark,
>
> On 6/7/2011 2:36 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 07/06/2011 19:30, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>> Keiichi,
>>>
>>> On 6/7/2011 7:37 AM, Keiichi Fujino wrote:
Index: conf/web.xml
=
Mark,
On 6/7/2011 2:36 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 07/06/2011 19:30, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> Keiichi,
>>
>> On 6/7/2011 7:37 AM, Keiichi Fujino wrote:
>>> Index: conf/web.xml
>>> ===
>>> --- conf/web.xml(revision 1127122)
>>
On 07/06/2011 19:30, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Keiichi,
>
> On 6/7/2011 7:37 AM, Keiichi Fujino wrote:
>> Index: conf/web.xml
>> ===
>> --- conf/web.xml (revision 1127122)
>> +++ conf/web.xml (working copy)
>> @@ -4176,4 +4
Keiichi,
On 6/7/2011 7:37 AM, Keiichi Fujino wrote:
> Index: conf/web.xml
> ===
> --- conf/web.xml (revision 1127122)
> +++ conf/web.xml (working copy)
> @@ -4176,4 +4176,6 @@
> index.jsp
>
>
> +
> +
>
On 07/06/2011 16:21, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2011/6/7 Keiichi Fujino :
>> Hi All.
>>
>> Tomcat7.0.15 can not replicate session if web application defines
>> in WEB-INF/web.xml.
>> Tomcat7.0.14 can replicate session if web application defines
>> in WEB-INF/web.xml.
>> The behavior of this defa
2011/6/7 Keiichi Fujino :
> Hi All.
>
> Tomcat7.0.15 can not replicate session if web application defines
> in WEB-INF/web.xml.
> Tomcat7.0.14 can replicate session if web application defines
> in WEB-INF/web.xml.
> The behavior of this default was changed by rev1130618.
> The cause is conf/web.x
On 07/06/2011 12:37, Keiichi Fujino wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> Tomcat7.0.15 can not replicate session if web application defines
> in WEB-INF/web.xml.
> Tomcat7.0.14 can replicate session if web application defines
> in WEB-INF/web.xml.
> The behavior of this default was changed by rev1130618.
> The c
Hi All.
Tomcat7.0.15 can not replicate session if web application defines
in WEB-INF/web.xml.
Tomcat7.0.14 can replicate session if web application defines
in WEB-INF/web.xml.
The behavior of this default was changed by rev1130618.
The cause is conf/web.xml is not distributable.
To enable sessi
14 matches
Mail list logo
