Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop some JK components

2017-11-22 Thread Christopher Schultz
Mark, On 11/21/17 7:58 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > All, > > I've been looking at jk/trunk with a view to rolling a release in the > near future. (It has been just over a year since the last release.) > > As I have been looking through the source, I have noticed a number of > components that we stil

Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop some JK components

2017-11-22 Thread Mark Thomas
On 21/11/17 14:50, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > >> All, >> >> I've been looking at jk/trunk with a view to rolling a release in the >> near future. (It has been just over a year since the last release.) >> >> As I have been looking through the sour

Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop some JK components

2017-11-21 Thread Rémy Maucherat
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > All, > > I've been looking at jk/trunk with a view to rolling a release in the > near future. (It has been just over a year since the last release.) > > As I have been looking through the source, I have noticed a number of > components that we

Re: [PROPOSAL] Drop some JK components

2017-11-21 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 21.11.2017 um 13:58 schrieb Mark Thomas: All, I've been looking at jk/trunk with a view to rolling a release in the near future. (It has been just over a year since the last release.) As I have been looking through the source, I have noticed a number of components that we still include in th

[PROPOSAL] Drop some JK components

2017-11-21 Thread Mark Thomas
All, I've been looking at jk/trunk with a view to rolling a release in the near future. (It has been just over a year since the last release.) As I have been looking through the source, I have noticed a number of components that we still include in the source that I think we can/should remove bef