On 08/11/2010 18:05, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 18:26 +0100, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> On 08.11.2010 18:05, Remy Maucherat wrote:
>>> I'll up that to -1, with another concern I've just thought about: if
>>> using a session id path which includes more than one webapp, the version
>>>
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 18:26 +0100, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 08.11.2010 18:05, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> > I'll up that to -1, with another concern I've just thought about: if
> > using a session id path which includes more than one webapp, the version
> > numbers will have problems matching between th
On 08/11/2010 17:26, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 08.11.2010 18:05, Remy Maucherat wrote:
>> I'll up that to -1, with another concern I've just thought about: if
>> using a session id path which includes more than one webapp, the version
>> numbers will have problems matching between the two webapps.
>
On 08.11.2010 18:05, Remy Maucherat wrote:
I'll up that to -1, with another concern I've just thought about: if
using a session id path which includes more than one webapp, the version
numbers will have problems matching between the two webapps.
You mean situations like portals / emptysessionpa
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 15:46 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
> I did consider that approach but rejected it for a couple of reasons:
> - Mapper needs to be manager aware - it isn't currently
Add a one method interface to be able to perform a session lookup.
> - Performance
Likely, having to do String m
On 08/11/2010 15:40, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 14:31 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> We might be able to avoid that be limiting the version to just integers.
>> I think that is reasonable but would like to hear some feedback from others.
>>
>> That does raise the issue of whether t
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 14:31 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
> We might be able to avoid that be limiting the version to just integers.
> I think that is reasonable but would like to hear some feedback from others.
>
> That does raise the issue of whether to convert the provided version to
> a (zero padd
On 08/11/2010 15:09, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Furthermore we could as a convenience convert all dots to underscores and
Or s/dots/non-alphanumerics/
p
0x62590808.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 08.11.2010 15:27, Mark Thomas wrote:
Yep - that looks like a left-over from when I was playing with int
rather than String for version. I'm still in two minds about that bit.
There are places internally where using String makes it easier but
limiting it to int would allow us to avoid a bunch o
On 06/11/2010 13:00, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 06.11.2010 12:57, Tim Funk wrote:
>> When running mod_jk with sticky session, but not using tomcat clustering
>> ... Will adding a new version append the version number to the end of
>> the session cookie AFTER the engineId (used by mod_jk for determinin
On 06/11/2010 11:57, Tim Funk wrote:
> This might cause a problem of using == instead of equals() for strcmp
>
> if (version == (request.getContext().getWebappVersion())) {
> mapRequired = false;
> }
Yep - that looks like a left-over from when I was playing with int
rather than String for ver
On 06.11.2010 14:00, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 06.11.2010 12:57, Tim Funk wrote:
When running mod_jk with sticky session, but not using tomcat clustering
... Will adding a new version append the version number to the end of
the session cookie AFTER the engineId (used by mod_jk for determining
where
On 06.11.2010 12:57, Tim Funk wrote:
When running mod_jk with sticky session, but not using tomcat clustering
... Will adding a new version append the version number to the end of
the session cookie AFTER the engineId (used by mod_jk for determining
where to route the request)
Tried it and the
This might cause a problem of using == instead of equals() for strcmp
if (version == (request.getContext().getWebappVersion())) {
mapRequired = false;
}
When running mod_jk with sticky session, but not using tomcat clustering
... Will adding a new version append the version number to the e
All,
The clean-up is in place and I have a patch [1] that adds support for
parallel deployment. There is still some work to do before the feature
can be used (Manager app needs to be made version aware when listing
apps, need to test with clustering, need to write some docs) but I'd
like to apply
15 matches
Mail list logo
