On 25/05/2016 15:03, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 25/05/2016 12:26, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
>> 2016-05-25 12:43 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas :
>>> 1. Simplified JULI that uses JUL directly but with our existing
>>> LogManager and configuration extensions.
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>
>> I'd vote 6. Switching is a
On 25/05/2016 12:26, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> 2016-05-25 12:43 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas :
>
>> I've been looking at Bug 58588 [1]. It looks clear that the JULI extras
>> JARs no longer add value and I'm happy to remove them. That bug also
>> raises the question "How would users switch Tomcat's interna
On 25/05/2016 12:26, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> 2016-05-25 12:43 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas :
>
>> I've been looking at Bug 58588 [1]. It looks clear that the JULI extras
>> JARs no longer add value and I'm happy to remove them. That bug also
>> raises the question "How would users switch Tomcat's interna
2016-05-25 12:43 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas :
> I've been looking at Bug 58588 [1]. It looks clear that the JULI extras
> JARs no longer add value and I'm happy to remove them. That bug also
> raises the question "How would users switch Tomcat's internal logging to
> LOGBack, log4j2 or something else?"
I've been looking at Bug 58588 [1]. It looks clear that the JULI extras
JARs no longer add value and I'm happy to remove them. That bug also
raises the question "How would users switch Tomcat's internal logging to
LOGBack, log4j2 or something else?".
A quick look at the respective manuals suggest
