https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69361
--- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas ---
Fixed in:
- 11.0.x for 11.0.0 onwards
- 10.1.x for 10.1.31 onwards
- 9.0.x for 9.0.96 onwards
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69361
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69361
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas ---
Seems reasonable to me. I'm about to tag 11.0.0 so I'll fix this before I do.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69361
--- Comment #4 from Michael Osipov ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #3)
> So checking I understand correctly.
>
> If the file system ordering behaviour is consistent from run to run then,
> currently, the order of entries in a multi-s
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69361
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas ---
So checking I understand correctly.
If the file system ordering behaviour is consistent from run to run then,
currently, the order of entries in a multi-status response is not consistent
between runs. This i
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69361
--- Comment #2 from Michael Osipov ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #1)
> Does this become moot if we fix bug 69362 ?
No, it does not because the actual order of the FS is undefined and the order
in hash varies from run to tun. So eve
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69361
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas ---
Does this become moot if we fix bug 69362 ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69361
Michael Osipov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||micha...@apache.org
--
You are recei
