https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #24 from elatl...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #21)
> No, h2psec won't be added to the tests
a very simple bash script can be used to trigger and test:
URL="$1"
LOAD=9
for N in $(
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #23 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to elatllat from comment #20)
> What will dissuade me from testing RCs is when 4/5 links in the RC email are
> 404.
>
> Please fix that.
Those links are valid during voting. After the vot
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #22 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to elatllat from comment #20)
> more aside:
>
> What will dissuade me from testing RCs is when 4/5 links in the RC email are
> 404.
>
> Please fix that.
>
> https://lists.apache.org/list
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #20 from elatl...@gmail.com ---
more aside:
What will dissuade me from testing RCs is when 4/5 links in the RC email are
404.
Please fix that.
https://lists.apache.org/list?dev@tomcat.apache.org:lte=1M:[VOTE]%20Release%20Apache%20
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #19 from elatl...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #17)
> ... we expect to provide new releases early next week.
Thanks, will h2spec be added to automated tests to catch related future
regressions?
As a minor a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #18 from Mark Thomas ---
I believe I have a fix for this. It works on my dev machine (Linux). I'm just
running the tests on the usual set of platforms before tagging the release.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
Matafagafo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matafag...@gmail.com
--
You are receivin
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #17 from Mark Thomas ---
I understand what is going wrong and I have a potential fix that addresses the
issue. The unit tests pass with the fix applied. Before I commit the fix I want
to make sure that there are any other, related f
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #16 from Mark Thomas ---
You can work around the issue by setting:
discardRequestsAndResponses="true"
on the UpgradeProtocol element for HTTP/2.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #14 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
(In reply to elatllat from comment #10)
> (In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #6)
> > Release votes are announced on the dev list.
>
> I'm not seeing anything relevant:
>
> https://lists.apache.or
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #13 from Mark Thomas ---
I'm seeing something similar. Running the h2spec test suite seems to trigger
the bad state reliably. Next step is to use git bisect to figure out where the
problem was introduced. Once we know which commit i
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #12 from elatl...@gmail.com ---
I can trigger this issue just by reloading a page with ~40 assets.
I can not trigger it on a page with 5 assets.
Once the issue is triggered it manifests on pages with 5 assets (2 to 4 of 5
will fail)
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #11 from elatl...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 39866
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39866&action=edit
curl log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #10 from elatl...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #6)
> Release votes are announced on the dev list.
I'm not seeing anything relevant:
https://lists.apache.org/list?dev@tomcat.apache.org:release%20candidate:
Pl
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #9 from Mark Thomas ---
The errors I am seeing on the rare occasions I am able to reproduce what I
think is this new error suggest an issue with header processing.
The stack trace in the attachment looks like the result of the clie
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #8 from EJ Egyed ---
I am experiencing an error I believe is related on 9.0.94. After reverting to
9.0.93 the error went away. I am not sure how to reproduce the error, but was
seeing errors written to the catalina log file. Attache
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #7 from EJ Egyed ---
Created attachment 39865
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39865&action=edit
Catalina log file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #6 from Mark Thomas ---
Release votes are announced on the dev list.
It appears that this bug is harder to reproduce that it first appeared. I've
seen in - or something that might be it - with 10.1.x and 11.0.x but not 9.0.x
and I
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #5 from elatl...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #4)
> I'll note that bugs that get reported during the release vote nearly always
> result in the vote being cancelled, the bug being fixed and a new release
> vote
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas ---
I'll note that bugs that get reported during the release vote nearly always
result in the vote being cancelled, the bug being fixed and a new release vote.
To put it another way, test the release candidate du
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #3 from elatl...@gmail.com ---
Please let me know what "supporting information" I can share. This regression
is not happening in any other 10.x build.
The last log line is just
12-Sep-2024 08:46:35.076 INFO [main] org.apache.catali
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #2 from elatl...@gmail.com ---
I sent an email to us...@infra.apache.org because commenting on this bug is
producing a bug (Too many connections at
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl5/5.34/DBI.pm line 691.)
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
--- Comment #1 from Chuck Caldarale ---
Without some useful supporting information, this will be closed as WORKSFORME.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69320
elatl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P5
Severity|normal
25 matches
Mail list logo
