https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67926
Michael Osipov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67926
--- Comment #5 from Michael Osipov ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #4)
> +1 - we are already using that class in the SPNEGO authenticator
I'll try prepare a PR for this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67926
--- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas ---
+1 - we are already using that class in the SPNEGO authenticator
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67926
--- Comment #3 from Michael Osipov ---
I think the easiest solution is to use org.ietf.jgss.Oid.Oid(byte[]) and the
invoke #toString()
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67926
Han Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||Beginner
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67926
--- Comment #2 from Michael Osipov ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #1)
> Whether the user is provided with the OID in string or byte form doesn't
> change the fact that the PEM file isn't going to be usable.
>
> The byte string is su
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67926
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|minor |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from Mark Tho
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67926
Michael Osipov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||micha...@apache.org
--
You are recei
