https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66875
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66875
--- Comment #11 from Mark Thomas ---
I think there are two separate issues here.
1. When Spring sets jakarta.servlet.error.exception that triggers Tomcat's
internal error handling. Whether Spring should do that and whether that should
have the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66875
--- Comment #10 from Mark Thomas ---
(In reply to Nils Kohrs from comment #4)
> Here is a minimal project to reproduce it:
> https://github.com/nilskohrs/tomcat-bug-66875
Thanks. This reproduces the issue as originally described with Tomcat 10
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66875
--- Comment #9 from Mark Thomas ---
The simpler test case behaves as desired if the response buffer is flushed
after the application provided error response is written.
I'm not convinced that the test case completely reproduces the reported is
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66875
--- Comment #8 from Han Li ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #7)
> The original bug report was for two JSON responses in a single HTTP
> response. Is that still an issue?
>
> Is the error message regarding the response already being co
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66875
--- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas ---
The original bug report was for two JSON responses in a single HTTP response.
Is that still an issue?
Is the error message regarding the response already being committed in addition
to the multiple JSON bodi
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66875
--- Comment #6 from Han Li ---
It is indeed possible to reproduce it, here is the debug log:
2023-10-07T18:55:08.622+08:00 DEBUG 10702 --- [o-8080-Acceptor]
o.apache.tomcat.util.threads.LimitLatch : Counting up[http-nio-8080-Acceptor]
latch=1
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66875
Nils Kohrs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WORKSFORME |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66875
--- Comment #4 from Nils Kohrs ---
Here is a minimal project to reproduce it:
https://github.com/nilskohrs/tomcat-bug-66875
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66875
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66875
Nils Kohrs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66875
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66875
Phillip Webb changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pw...@pivotal.io
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66875
Nils Kohrs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Catalina|Connectors
--
You are receiving this mai
14 matches
Mail list logo