https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
--- Comment #20 from Mark Thomas ---
(In reply to Thomas from comment #18)
> May I ask the question, when the next release will happen? I mean, it's kind
> of urgent to install an update due to the security breach ...
No, it isn't. I assume yo
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
--- Comment #19 from mgrigorov ---
The new release has been voted last week, but it has been canceled due to a
problem.
7.0.103 has been just cut and a new vote will start in few minutes.
Check the dev@ mailing list for details.
--
You are re
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
--- Comment #18 from thomas.w...@gfk.com ---
May I ask the question, when the next release will happen? I mean, it's kind of
urgent to install an update due to the security breach ...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assigne
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
--- Comment #17 from Roland ---
Okay, then sorry again. I saw that the "/" removal for jarPath happened in
WebappClassLoaderBase and I was afraid that it needs to be done for the call in
line 1594 too for satisfying other callers than WebappSer
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
--- Comment #15 from Roland ---
Sorry for the confusion. I found this by "visual inspection". You wrote "the
class loader being used hasn't got the same work-around that Tomcat's class
loader has". Is WebappClassLoaderBase the Tomcat class load
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
--- Comment #14 from Mark Thomas ---
I'm confused. How did removing the leading "/" manage to fix it for you as per
comment #10 if, with that fix applied, it is still broken?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for th
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
Roland changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
Roland changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rmuelle...@posteo.de
--
You are receiving th
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
--- Comment #11 from Mark Thomas ---
I suspect that is because the class loader being used hasn't got the same
work-around that Tomcat's class loader has.
I want to run a few tests first but I think the answer is going to be removing
the leadi
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
rmuelle...@posteo.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mgallinu...@gmail.com
--- Comment #9
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||qiuguoqiang2...@163.com
--- Comment #8 f
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
--- Comment #6 from thomas.w...@gfk.com ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #5)
> I uploaded a build here:
> http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/v7.0.101-dev/
>
> This isn't an official release. It is just for testing purposes.
This seem
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas ---
I uploaded a build here:
http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/v7.0.101-dev/
This isn't an official release. It is just for testing purposes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
--- Comment #4 from thomas.w...@gfk.com ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #3)
> How about a test environment? It would be helpful to know if the issue you
> are seeing has already been fixed or is a new issue.
Yes, you're right - can yo
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas ---
How about a test environment? It would be helpful to know if the issue you are
seeing has already been fixed or is a new issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
--- Comment #2 from thomas.w...@gfk.com ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #1)
> Probably the SCI regression that has already been fixed. Are you able to
> build Tomcat 7.0.x from source to test the latest code?
Unfortunately not (as we
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas ---
Probably the SCI regression that has already been fixed. Are you able to build
Tomcat 7.0.x from source to test the latest code?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
21 matches
Mail list logo
