https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63080
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|8.5.x-trunk |unspecified
Product|Tomcat 8
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63080
--- Comment #4 from Martin bestandig ---
Dellet
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apa
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63080
--- Comment #3 from HanLi ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #1)
> I would recommend adding a new configuration option which specifies which
> strategy to use: legacy, rfc7239, or "both" where both types of headers are
> accepted
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63080
--- Comment #2 from HanLi ---
Hi all,
I have implemented RFC7239 as I understand it, but as this is my first time
implementing RFC functionality, I may not have a good understanding of RFC and
may not have taken some things into account. I woul
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63080
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--
You are receiving this m
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63080
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Schultz ---
I would recommend adding a new configuration option which specifies which
strategy to use: legacy, rfc7239, or "both" where both types of headers are
accepted. The default should be the old behavior.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63080
Christopher Schultz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||Beginner
--
You are receiving t
