https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62731
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62731
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas ---
Indeed. However, it isn't that different from the current behaviour which only
differs in that the scheme, host and port aren't present. The risky part (the
undecoded, unnormalized path) is the same.
--
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62731
--- Comment #2 from Remy Maucherat ---
But then actually using this sort of input is highly risky :(
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62731
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas ---
Similar to https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/websocket-api/issues/228
On balance the full, undecoded, unnormalized URI including query string looks
to the the right thing to return.
--
You are receiving this
