[Bug 62405] Add Rereadable Request Filter

2018-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62405 --- Comment #6 from Igal Sapir --- (In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #5) > I usually head towards tomcat.markmail.org when I need to search the > archives. Good to know. I was looking at http://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html and under archiv

[Bug 62405] Add Rereadable Request Filter

2018-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62405 --- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas --- I usually head towards tomcat.markmail.org when I need to search the archives. >From memory, getPart() and getParts() also caused complications. I don't think getTrailerFields() etc. was part of any of thos

[Bug 62405] Add Rereadable Request Filter

2018-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62405 --- Comment #4 from Igal Sapir --- (In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #3) > This has come up before. A few of the past threads: > http://tomcat.markmail.org/thread/fumpfuspt7a3nesz > http://tomcat.markmail.org/thread/tqig7tldxjrra3bh Going

[Bug 62405] Add Rereadable Request Filter

2018-05-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62405 --- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas --- This has come up before. A few of the past threads: http://tomcat.markmail.org/thread/fumpfuspt7a3nesz http://tomcat.markmail.org/thread/tqig7tldxjrra3bh It would be worth a more thorough search of the archi

[Bug 62405] Add Rereadable Request Filter

2018-05-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62405 --- Comment #2 from Igal Sapir --- (In reply to George Stanchev from comment #1) > I am just curious, what happens if a bad actor decides to send a 10 gig > request and the filter is engaged. Obviously you have to read the whole > thing to memo

[Bug 62405] Add Rereadable Request Filter

2018-05-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62405 George Stanchev changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All --- Comment #1 from George Stanc