https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
--- Comment #39 from mattk ---
Is it known whether this bug was introduced in 8.5.x? Or did it also exist in
8.0.x or 7.0.x?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
--- Comment #38 from matt...@cacorp.com ---
I'm updated to 8.5.16 using NIO, I'll be sure to let you know if the crashes
continue. Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
--- Comment #36 from Remy Maucherat ---
Created attachment 35069
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35069&action=edit
APR SSL support sync
For APR, here is what the patch would look like. Please test it if you can.
--
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
--- Comment #35 from Remy Maucherat ---
For the APR connector issue, since I believe it is always possible and
legitimate to have a concurrent socket close especially with HTTP/2, the
accesses from AprSSLSupport would need to sync on
AprEndpoin
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
--- Comment #34 from Remy Maucherat ---
I improved the patch (hopefully) and committed it, it will be in 9M22 and
8.5.16. I haven't looked at the APR connector issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #35051|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
--- Comment #32 from Remy Maucherat ---
Created attachment 35051
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35051&action=edit
Test patch for OpenSSL engine
As the OpenSSL engine is affected, I guess it's inevitable some SSL session
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
--- Comment #31 from Ludovic Pénet ---
Maybe I did something really stupid, but I get :
jsvc.exec: symbol lookup error:
/usr/share/java/tomcat-base_senateurs-commun/libtcnative-1.so.0.2.12: undefined
symbol: assert
--
You are receiving this
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
--- Comment #30 from Ludovic Pénet ---
Christopher : yes, I statically link the openssl lib to avoid depending on the
versions installed on the host system, as I update them much quicker.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
--- Comment #29 from Christopher Schultz ---
Ludovic, why are you building OpenSSL in "no-shared" mode? If you are building
OpenSSL in no-shared mode, how is OpenSSL 1.0.2j being loaded into the JVM
process? Are you statically-linking OpenSSL i
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
--- Comment #28 from Christopher Schultz ---
This *is* tcnative.
It extends beyond the scope of the APR connector. Can you reproduce this in a
testing environment? I have a small patch for sslinfo.c:
At line 293, add this:
s = (tcn_ssl_c
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
--- Comment #27 from matt...@cacorp.com ---
(In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #20)
> Are you really going to update this BZ every two weeks whenever you
> experience a JVM crash ? Surely you realize posting the same thing ten times
> isn'
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
--- Comment #26 from Ludovic Pénet ---
I can. For GNU/Linux.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
--- Comment #25 from Thomas ---
I can try to compile my own version of the tcnative library.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To un
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
--- Comment #24 from Christopher Schultz ---
Are any of the reporters of this bug able to compile their own custom tcnative
library if I provide a small instrumentation patch?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for t
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
--- Comment #23 from Christopher Schultz ---
Some initial investigation based upon the initial bug report + crash dump.
1. The call from Java is AprSSLSupport.getCipherSuite
2. AprSSLSupport.getCipherSuite calls SSLSocket.getInfoS [native]
...
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t.reisin...@sisworld.com
--- Comment
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
--- Comment #21 from matt...@cacorp.com ---
(In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #20)
> Are you really going to update this BZ every two weeks whenever you
> experience a JVM crash ? Surely you realize posting the same thing ten times
> isn'
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
--- Comment #20 from Remy Maucherat ---
Are you really going to update this BZ every two weeks whenever you experience
a JVM crash ? Surely you realize posting the same thing ten times isn't going
to help, right ?
I'd recommend trying NIO(1 or
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
--- Comment #19 from matt...@cacorp.com ---
Created attachment 35004
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35004&action=edit
Another crash log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
--- Comment #18 from matt...@cacorp.com ---
Just crashed again, is there anything I can look for to help? Please?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
--- Comment #17 from matt...@cacorp.com ---
Another crash last night, please let me know what I can do to help.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
matt...@cacorp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Comment #16 from matt...@c
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #14 from Mark Thoma
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
matt...@cacorp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Comment #15 from matt...@c
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
matt...@cacorp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Comment #13 from matt...@c
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
--- Comment #12 from matt...@cacorp.com ---
Unfortunately I have no idea what is causing it and I don't know how to
reproduce it. I installed a fresh copy of 8.5.11 with tcnative 1.2.10 and then
copied in my configuration files. It crashed only
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEEDINFO
--- Comment #11 from Mark Thoma
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
Ludovic Pénet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
--- Comment #9 from matt...@cacorp.com ---
Created attachment 34790
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34790&action=edit
8.5.11 Windows Crash Log
This crash still exists in 8.5.11 on Windows. I've uploaded my log.
--
You a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
Ludovic Pénet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEEDINFO
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
--- Comment #7 from Ludovic Pénet ---
Yes, in fact, I already tried it.
And yes, it has the same behaviour.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
--- Comment #6 from Christopher Schultz ---
I would be interested to know if Tomcat 8.5.8 with the libtcnative from 8.5.6
still exhibits the same problem. Is that something you can test easily?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
--- Comment #5 from Ludovic Pénet ---
Thank you for your quick reply.
I acknowledge your request and will do my best to prepare this.
However, I have to finish urgent work before a long christmas break and I might
not do this before the secon
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
Christopher Schultz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34512|text/x-log |text/plain
mime type|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
--- Comment #3 from Ludovic Pénet ---
Specifying sslImplementationName is just plain paranoia, and to make it clear
for coworkers arriving on the project and not already knowing it is the default
with APR.
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
--- Comment #2 from Remy Maucherat ---
Maybe, but when I see that, I think you should complain to other people as
well:
j
org.apache.catalina.connector.Request.getAttributeNames()Ljava/util/Enumeration;+17
j
org.apache.myfaces.webapp.ManagedB
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60461
--- Comment #1 from Ludovic Pénet ---
I did not explicitly mentionned it, but I use stock openssl sources and the
native version included in tomcat 8.5.8 sources.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
41 matches
Mail list logo
