https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60381
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60381
--- Comment #5 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> ---
I see that you have picked up my proposal to reuse the Contained interface:
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@tomcat.apache.org/msg113336.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60381
--- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas ---
(In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #3)
> Don't you think it is worthwile to port back to 8.5?
No.
> Do you think that the simple class name is sufficient?
Yes.
> I have noticed that a lot of compon
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60381
--- Comment #3 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #2)
> The toString() implementations have been pretty much unchanged since the
> lifecycle refactoring in 7.0.x. While users shouldn't not be expec
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60381
--- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas ---
The toString() implementations have been pretty much unchanged since the
lifecycle refactoring in 7.0.x. While users shouldn't not be expecting these to
be in any particular format, the chances are that there
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60381
--- Comment #1 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> ---
I am willing to provide a patch if we agree on one approach.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.