https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60297
--- Comment #6 from Axel U ---
I am suggesting not porting it to 8.0.x and 7.0.x.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe,
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60297
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60297
--- Comment #4 from Axel U ---
Ok.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60297
--- Comment #3 from Remy Maucherat ---
That already works, except there's no AprLifecycleListener. It's the same as
the regular configuration, which has it in server.xml. Remove it and there
won't be an APR connector used automatically.
--
Yo
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60297
--- Comment #2 from Axel U ---
The changes made will do the trick in regards to using the supplied connector.
It leaves the second part of my comment open though. So, is there any harm if
the getServer() method always adds an APR LifescyleLi
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60297
--- Comment #1 from Remy Maucherat ---
Created attachment 34401
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34401&action=edit
Tomcat get/setConnector changes
Ok, maybe it's not very intuitive, and I don't see the point of having a
c
