[Bug 60035] java.io.IOException: Too many open files

2017-08-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60035 Vaibhav Bhandari changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vbhand...@vmware.com -- You are re

[Bug 60035] java.io.IOException: Too many open files

2017-08-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60035 --- Comment #12 from Vaibhav Bhandari --- (In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #7) > This has been fixed in the following branches: > - 9.0.x for 9.0.0.M10 onwards > - 8.5.x for 8.5.5 onwards > > 8.0.x and earlier were not affected. As menti

[Bug 60035] java.io.IOException: Too many open files

2017-01-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60035 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dracu...@hotmail.com --- Comment #11 fro

[Bug 60035] java.io.IOException: Too many open files

2016-09-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60035 --- Comment #10 from Mark Thomas --- Thanks for confirming the fix. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-u

[Bug 60035] java.io.IOException: Too many open files

2016-09-12 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60035 --- Comment #9 from Marcus Hughes --- All indications are that this fixed our issues. Thanks again. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ---

[Bug 60035] java.io.IOException: Too many open files

2016-09-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60035 --- Comment #8 from Marcus Hughes --- Hi Mark, Apologies Joe went quiet - but he left the company. Thanks for looking into this, it kind of brought down all the servers we deployed the upgrade onto so was pretty serious for us. What you have id

[Bug 60035] java.io.IOException: Too many open files

2016-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60035 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 60035] java.io.IOException: Too many open files

2016-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60035 --- Comment #6 from Mark Thomas --- Good news. I've figured out the root cause and there will be a fix in the next release. Indirectly, r1746551 was the issue. The problem occurs for TLS connections when the connection is dropped after the so

[Bug 60035] java.io.IOException: Too many open files

2016-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60035 --- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas --- I think I have been able to reproduce this: - Run Tomcat on machine 1 - Run abs test on machine 2 - Disable network on machine 1 Often, but not always, this leaves sockets open. I've searched through the co

[Bug 60035] java.io.IOException: Too many open files

2016-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60035 --- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas --- I've reviewed the changes and I don't see anything problematic yet. There is what looks like a single fd leak on first use that I want to track down but that is unlikely to be related to this issue. Given th

[Bug 60035] java.io.IOException: Too many open files

2016-08-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60035 --- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas --- Thanks for tracking down which version this appeared in. I'll take a look at the diff between the two tags. I agree that the change you highlight is a good place to start. -- You are receiving this mail bec

[Bug 60035] java.io.IOException: Too many open files

2016-08-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60035 --- Comment #2 from joe.stepow...@gmail.com --- Hi Mark I have been able to pinpoint that the issue started with 8.5.3. 8.5.2 seems to be ok. I can see from the 8.5.3 changlog at least one change around sockets: "Fix a cause of multiple att

[Bug 60035] java.io.IOException: Too many open files

2016-08-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60035 --- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas --- I'm starting to look at this. I've already found and fixed an unrelated file descriptor leak and I can see a couple more places where fixes might be required. However, I haven't - yet - seen anything that loo