https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58284
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Shore ---
Fantastic. Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58284
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58284
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Shore ---
Created attachment 33114
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33114&action=edit
Patch for bug
Had some test failures but I think it's my local setup. Could you run it
through the test sui
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58284
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Shore ---
Will do. Thanks Mark.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58284
--- Comment #10 from Mark Thomas ---
You probably have a day or two. I'll update the bug when I reach the point
where I need the patch. If you can update it as well when you start work we
should be able to avoid duplicating effort.
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58284
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Shore ---
Hey sorry the the delay in response. I was out of the office last week and
haven't had a chance to start this. How soon is soon? I probably won't be able
to get to this until later in the week.
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58284
--- Comment #8 from Mark Thomas ---
Ping? I'm likely to be in a position to start the next 8.0.x release soon and
this needs to be fixed before the tag. If no patch is forthcoming, I'll likely
end up writing the patch myself.
--
You are recei
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58284
--- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas ---
Any progress?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58284
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Shore ---
Great, I'll get started on it. Thanks for the guidance.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To u
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58284
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Schultz ---
Patches are always welcome!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: d
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58284
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Shore ---
Sounds good to me. Would you prefer I submit a patch for this?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58284
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas ---
Exactly.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apach
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58284
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Shore ---
Thanks for the update! If I understand correctly the suggested change would be
to do away with the NOT_SERIALIZED marker in StandardSession and rely on
TC_EXCEPTION in ObjectOutputStream. In write object we
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58284
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas ---
I've written some unit tests that confirm the behaviour you've reported.
I'm currently leaning towards trying to implement what the current code appears
to be trying to do which is to log a warning but to ca
14 matches
Mail list logo
